2025-12-26 07:22:32

A leading DEX governance community has just approved an important proposal, called the 'Unification Plan'. The key point is: the community voted to agree on a radical measure—burning 100 million governance tokens. This is not a small move; it will have a substantial impact on the entire token economic structure. Token deflation is often seen by the market as a positive signal, directly affecting token supply and the rights distribution of long-term holders. From a governance perspective, this reflects the community's clear consensus on the project's direction and demonstrates DEF ecosystem's determination in self-improvement. Industry insiders generally pay close attention to such major token mechanism adjustments, as they often indicate strategic shifts by the project team or ecosystem optimization upgrades.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DAOTruant

· 8h ago

Burning 100 million tokens? Now it depends on whether the subsequent actions can truly boost the market; just deflation isn't enough. If it's just community consensus forced through, can this wave hold up? Deflation is deflation, but the key still depends on ecosystem development; otherwise, it's just a routine of cutting leeks. Wow, this move... Should I go all in, everyone? Feels like every burn is to rescue the market; is this truly optimization or just another scam? Holders are happy, but how will new entrants play? Trolls, it's your turn to speak—burning tokens = admitting failure? Honestly, I've seen too many proposals like this, and in the end, they all come to nothing. Either buying too early or selling too late, what's the point? Strategic shift 🤔, let's see what happens next; right now, it's just a game of expectations.

View OriginalReply0

ChainBrain

· 8h ago

Burn 100 million tokens? Now it depends on the subsequent trend. Deflation sounds good, but whether it can boost the market is the key. Really? Such aggressive actions are usually just paving the way for major events. Burning 100 million tokens is a big hype, but the main thing is how the liquidity looks. Don’t end up with a mess again. Does community voting count? What does the exchange say? Don’t get carried away. I've seen many token mechanism adjustments like this, but in the end, it all depends on whether it can truly improve the ecosystem fundamentals.

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 8h ago

100 million tokens directly burned? This will really concentrate the chips, and the days for long-term holders are coming.

View OriginalReply0

DegenDreamer

· 8h ago

Burn 100 million tokens? Sure, but it really needs to be implemented, not just empty talk and proposals. --- The deflationary approach, every time they say it's a good thing, but what’s the result? The token price still keeps falling. --- Community consensus? Ha, just look at the voting turnout, most people didn't even vote. --- But I have to admit, daring to burn so many tokens shows at least a somewhat firm attitude, better than those who boast every day. --- The key is how to utilize this deflationary effect afterward, otherwise it's just self-congratulation. --- Again, it's about ecosystem optimization and upgrades. I'm tired of hearing these words; if the wallet can't grow, it's all pointless.

View OriginalReply0

DegenGambler

· 8h ago

Burning 100 million coins—it's politely called deflation, but frankly, it's just a disguised way to harvest retail investors. I've heard this kind of rhetoric too many times; whether it will rise or not depends entirely on the subsequent ecosystem implementation. Community voting? Haha, the big players have already made their decisions long ago.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoSurvivor

· 8h ago

Burn 100 million tokens? Now it depends on whether the follow-up can truly boost the market. Deflation sounds good, but I'm worried it's just another tactic before cutting profits. The real test is whether the ecosystem can take off; otherwise, burning tokens is pointless. Community consensus is a good thing, but do the voting participants really understand the project? The biggest risk with such bold moves is that people might hype it up temporarily, and if there's no follow-up, it will all be for nothing. Holders are smiling because with less supply, their权益分配也变好, which is theoretically a win-win situation. But I've seen too many cases where people shout for reform like this, only to do nothing after three months. Tokenomics sounds easy to talk about, but execution is the real challenge.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 8h ago

Burning 100 million tokens sounds impressive, but it depends on how large the actual circulating supply is—this is a supply line, not the end of the battle. Deflation expectations are easily speculated upon; historical cycles tell us that the first three months after a mechanism adjustment are the most dangerous, and retail investors chasing the high are usually the best opportunity for the main players to offload. Watching coldly from the sidelines, waiting to see the real data.

View OriginalReply0