2025-12-26 08:21:42

Regulators have flagged critical governance and due diligence lapses at the firm. The core issue: management failed to properly vet a scheme before rolling it out to users. Without adequate risk assessment and oversight mechanisms, consumers were essentially left exposed to an opportunity they couldn't fully grasp. It's a textbook case of institutional negligence in protecting retail participants.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

5 Likes

Reward
5
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gas_fee_therapy

· 8h ago

Another one? These kinds of things are really annoying, retail investors are just being harvested like leeks. When will the management truly care about our money... Due diligence is just a formality; we've seen through it long ago. These people don't take risk assessment seriously at all. It's a typical "issue tokens first, then talk" model, with users being used as guinea pigs. It's always remedial after the fact, and can't prevent a single incident. What do you think? Will the regulators really get serious this time?

View OriginalReply0

DoomCanister

· 12h ago

Here we go again, I've seen this trick too many times. Thorough due diligence? Risk assessment? Nice words, but in the end, they're just using retail investors as test subjects. The management's performance is really terrible. I just want to ask, who gave them the guts? That's why I keep saying, anyone who dares to go all-in without doing their own research deserves to get hurt.

View OriginalReply0

MoneyBurner

· 12h ago

Is it the same old story? Risk control is just for show. Honestly, they just want retail investors to be test subjects for the little guys.

View OriginalReply0

JustHereForAirdrops

· 12h ago

Coming again? Companies like this love to play "release first, then talk," anyway just to dump on retail investors. The management's move is really brilliant, they never thought about the users' lives and deaths. That's why I only exploit big V influencers for arbitrage, and I refuse to touch things I don't understand after researching myself. Someone should have taken care of these companies long ago; they can't even write a decent market stabilization message anymore.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainSniper

· 12h ago

Here it comes again... This kind of project should have been investigated long ago. Why are so many people still rushing in? --- Retail investors get scammed, institutions shift blame. It's always the same trick. --- You dare to go live without risk control? That's just ridiculous. --- Management level is this low and they can still raise funds? That's funny. --- Consumers bear the risk themselves. Anyway, regulators can't control it. --- That's why I only buy BTC. Other projects are all bombs. --- No due diligence was done... basic operation, friends. --- Every time there's a risk warning, retail investors still enter. Who can be blamed? --- Regulation sounds good, but when something goes wrong, it will still happen.

View OriginalReply0