People often tell me: "Bro, did you see Bitcoin hit $50,000? The US stock market isn't doing much, it seems like the crypto world is finally acting independently!" I always want to laugh—this is a typical surface-level view. What's the truth? The crypto market has never truly been independent; essentially, it is an "accelerator" and "magnifier" of traditional financial cycles. If you can't grasp this logic, you'll eventually get caught holding the bag.
To be clear: the bull and bear switches in the crypto market are fundamentally driven by the "credit cycle" of traditional finance. This cycle has two phases—loose and tight. During the loose phase, central banks print money and cut interest rates, market liquidity is abundant. Some funds flow into stocks, while others with high risk appetite move into assets like cryptocurrencies, causing both markets to rise together; during the tight phase, central banks raise interest rates and withdraw liquidity, making funds scarce. High-risk assets crash first, followed by the stock market falling into a bear market—neither can escape.
Looking at the real data makes this clear. From 2017 to now, the crypto market has completed two full bull-bear cycles, each perfectly aligned with traditional financial credit cycles. The 2017 bull market? It corresponds to the tail end of the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing from 2015 to 2018; the plunge in 2018? It coincided with the Fed's rate hikes; from 2020 to 2021, global central banks flooded the market to respond to the pandemic, and the crypto market surged again; in 2022, the market turned bearish as the Fed began aggressive rate hikes, and crypto collapsed. More intriguingly, the crypto market's bull-bear switches often lead the stock market by 3 to 6 months—for example, that in 2022.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
4 Likes
Reward
4
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SnapshotBot
· 9h ago
This guy is so right. I was also scammed by this before... When the central bank loosens monetary policy, the crypto market indeed moves first.
It's basically just money moving to higher-risk areas. When the stock market gets boring, people turn to crypto.
That wave in 2022 cost me some losses. Now looking at the charts, I finally understand—cryptocurrency is not independent at all; it's just a faster version of the financial cycle.
To put it simply, when easing and printing money, both rise; when tightening, high-risk assets are the first to bottom out... This logic is quite clear.
I've seen through it long ago. The crypto market is like a magnifying glass—when the Federal Reserve sneezes, the crypto market catches a cold.
The credit cycle theory sounds simple, but to really bottom out, you have to bet on when the Federal Reserve will turn hawkish... It's too difficult.
That's why some say the crypto market leads the stock market by 3 to 6 months. I think it's credible.
Honestly, understanding this logic means you've won half the battle, saving yourself from being led by the rhythm.
Is crypto independent? Wake up, everyone. The Federal Reserve is the real big player.
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 9h ago
Here we go again? The crypto circle's independent action, hilarious, still just dancing to the rhythm of the Federal Reserve.
Basically, it's an accelerated version of high-risk assets. When the central bank prints money, everyone goes crazy; when they raise interest rates, everyone kneels.
Since 2017, each cycle has been closely aligned. Who can't see that? But some people still insist on fantasizing that the crypto world will suddenly develop independent consciousness.
Not understanding that a peak 3 to 6 months in advance? That's the nature of a magnifying glass; leading doesn't mean independence.
The central bank's purse is the real parent. Forget that, and you'll eventually get cut.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 9h ago
Are you talking about "independence in the crypto circle" again? Wake up, it's still the same old dance of the credit cycle.
Wait, does a Federal Reserve rate hike necessarily mean Bitcoin will die first? Then how do you explain this year's rebound?
Honestly, the data does suggest that, but it just feels off.
It's really just retail investors' imagination exceeding reality.
The accelerator magnifying glass analogy isn't bad, but the problem is no one really understands the cycle.
Your logic is also betting on what the Federal Reserve will do next, isn't it?
By the way, 3 to 6 months in advance, what signals should we be looking at now?
Yes, the only thing that causes a rip-off is information asymmetry.
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemist
· 9h ago
ngl this "decoupling" narrative is just copium... btc leads the liquidation cascade, not the other way around. trad finance is literally the MEV extraction opportunity we're all chasing lol
People often tell me: "Bro, did you see Bitcoin hit $50,000? The US stock market isn't doing much, it seems like the crypto world is finally acting independently!" I always want to laugh—this is a typical surface-level view. What's the truth? The crypto market has never truly been independent; essentially, it is an "accelerator" and "magnifier" of traditional financial cycles. If you can't grasp this logic, you'll eventually get caught holding the bag.
To be clear: the bull and bear switches in the crypto market are fundamentally driven by the "credit cycle" of traditional finance. This cycle has two phases—loose and tight. During the loose phase, central banks print money and cut interest rates, market liquidity is abundant. Some funds flow into stocks, while others with high risk appetite move into assets like cryptocurrencies, causing both markets to rise together; during the tight phase, central banks raise interest rates and withdraw liquidity, making funds scarce. High-risk assets crash first, followed by the stock market falling into a bear market—neither can escape.
Looking at the real data makes this clear. From 2017 to now, the crypto market has completed two full bull-bear cycles, each perfectly aligned with traditional financial credit cycles. The 2017 bull market? It corresponds to the tail end of the Federal Reserve's quantitative easing from 2015 to 2018; the plunge in 2018? It coincided with the Fed's rate hikes; from 2020 to 2021, global central banks flooded the market to respond to the pandemic, and the crypto market surged again; in 2022, the market turned bearish as the Fed began aggressive rate hikes, and crypto collapsed. More intriguingly, the crypto market's bull-bear switches often lead the stock market by 3 to 6 months—for example, that in 2022.