Product managers, wallet developers, and architects must read this.

When evaluating a new generation of DApps, there's a core question to clarify first: Are you helping users "get things done," or are you helping users "express ideas"? These two paths are vastly different. Let's break it down.

**How are transactions generated?**

The traditional way is for users to handle it themselves. You need to know the target contract address, function signature, and how to encode parameters—if any parameter is wrong, assets are lost. The barrier is ridiculously high, with a 90% dropout rate among beginners.

A new approach from a different perspective: users only need to say one sentence—"I want to swap 100 USDT"—the rest, including underlying Calldata generation and transaction routing, is handled by the Solver network. Users become the client, turning into the principal party, which is how a bull market should look.

**Who pays the Gas fees?**

The traditional solution requires paying with native tokens. Operating on the Base chain? You must have ETH in your wallet. No ETH? Buy it on an exchange or bridge across chains... This process can discourage many users.

The new mechanism is like this: Solver front-loads ETH for Gas, and users pay service fees directly with USDT or other assets. Have you thought about it? In reality, which company would let customers buy electricity themselves to pay bills? DApps should follow this logic too.

What's the bottom line? Make blockchain accessible to ordinary people, rather than making it only serve tech enthusiasts.