I've been thinking about how to help more people understand the essence of this type of social mining projects. On the surface, it looks like 'posting to earn,' but it's actually much more than that.
The core mechanism is— it can identify who truly contributes value to the conversation, rather than just looking at who shouts the loudest or who floods the platform with fake engagement. The quality of your replies, the context of the discussion, the timing of your posts, along with the continuous activity of your account, all these factors combined carry more weight than mere exposure.
In other words, this system rewards meaningful interactions and constructive discussions, and is not friendly to accounts that rely on spamming, copying and pasting, or simply chasing numbers. That's also why the project team has higher quality requirements for participants—because the mechanism itself is designed to filter for value.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HodlKumamon
· 14h ago
That's easy to say, but how many people can really persist in producing valuable content... Most people still want to take the shortcut of spamming.
To put it nicely, it's filtering valuable content; to be blunt, it's selecting those who are truly willing to put in effort.
Xiongxiong thinks this logic is actually copying the self-purification mechanism of high-quality communities; data will speak for itself~
Wait, does that mean my few spam comments are going to be sidelined by the system? Crying.
Your analysis hits the mark; quality weight > exposure volume in this weight model. We need to learn to think long-term.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 15h ago
Basically, it's about prioritizing quality over quantity, and I like that.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 15h ago
It's just quality > quantity, it should have been like this a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 15h ago
Hmm... That's true, but it still feels like it could be easily exploited.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 15h ago
Hi, finally someone has explained this thoroughly. I'm just wondering why those accounts that were spammed wildly didn't make any money.
That's right, quality > traffic. That's the truth. I've also fallen into that trap before.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9ad11037
· 15h ago
Well said, quality is king. Those hype jobs should have been gone long ago.
View OriginalReply0
GasGasGasBro
· 15h ago
That's true, but how many can actually do it? Most people still rely on boosting numbers to make a living.
I've been thinking about how to help more people understand the essence of this type of social mining projects. On the surface, it looks like 'posting to earn,' but it's actually much more than that.
The core mechanism is— it can identify who truly contributes value to the conversation, rather than just looking at who shouts the loudest or who floods the platform with fake engagement. The quality of your replies, the context of the discussion, the timing of your posts, along with the continuous activity of your account, all these factors combined carry more weight than mere exposure.
In other words, this system rewards meaningful interactions and constructive discussions, and is not friendly to accounts that rely on spamming, copying and pasting, or simply chasing numbers. That's also why the project team has higher quality requirements for participants—because the mechanism itself is designed to filter for value.