Most token launches fail for predictable reasons: poor incentive design, misaligned TVL mechanics, rushed rollouts without community buy-in. Once you map out these failure patterns, the bigger picture clicks into place.



That's precisely what separates a genuine platform upgrade from the noise. When a Web3 solution actually addresses the structural problems—whether it's how value accumulates, how participants are incentivized, or how the protocol scales—you're looking at something fundamentally different. It's not about flashy features or marketing hype. It's about solving what breaks most projects at the foundation level.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperervip
· 9h ago
yeah ngl, "addresses structural problems" is what everyone claims right before the death spiral hits. seen this movie too many times—contract's fine on paper, tokenomics math checks out, then suddenly incentive layer implodes and here we are. what's actually different tho?
Reply0
liquidation_surfervip
· 9h ago
That's right, most coins die at the incentive design stage, rushing in without fully thinking through the logic.
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGnvip
· 9h ago
Most tokens die due to incentive design, which is really no longer news...
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)