2025-12-30 00:21:56

I recently asked an AI tool to analyze the market行情 of a certain cryptocurrency. It sounded quite impressive, and the analysis was thorough. But in the end, I realized—what they used for data was from three months ago. It immediately fell apart. This made me think of a problem: no matter how powerful an AI model is, when faced with "outdated information," it has to give a blank. It simply can't access real-time data, let alone verify the authenticity of the information.

But now, something interesting has happened. There is a project called APRO AI Oracle, aiming to fundamentally solve this pain point—deep integration of AI and blockchain.

**How to understand this AI Oracle?**

The most straightforward analogy is a "decentralized information distribution network." But instead of delivering conventional data, it provides real-time information streams that are multi-layer verified on-chain and tamper-proof.

What does a traditional oracle look like? It serves smart contracts, mainly telling the contract "what is the current Ethereum price." But what the AI oracle does is completely different—it continuously supplies structured market signals to AI models and autonomous agents (like certain automated trading bots). For example, "In the past 5 minutes, the liquidity pool depth of a DeFi protocol has decreased by one-fifth, and at the same time, there are concentrated negative comments on social media."

Where is the key difference? It’s in the "multi-node consensus" process. The data AI receives is not isolated information crawled from a single website, but trusted data provided after verification and agreement by a distributed network of nodes. This way, AI's judgment is upgraded from "based on uncertain speculation" to "based on verifiable facts."

**The practical value of APRO AI Oracle**

If this system can truly operate smoothly, its impact could be quite significant. Automated market makers, risk warning systems, on-chain risk control models—these applications, which originally rely on external data sources, can obtain higher-quality information inputs. From a technical perspective, the decentralized verification mechanism can indeed greatly enhance data credibility.

ETH1,75%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

unrekt.eth

· 12h ago

That's right, the biggest problem with AI bragging is outdated data; no matter how much it boasts, it's useless. If APRO's system can really be implemented, then the oracle is considered upgraded, and multi-node consensus sounds pretty good. But I just want to ask, is decentralized verification reliable? Could it be that a few big players are controlling the nodes again? Improving data credibility is a good thing, but can the risk warning system really be trusted? I still need to see the actual results.

View OriginalReply0

SwapWhisperer

· 12h ago

Another project aimed at "solving AI data latency" — whether it can actually be implemented is the key question. That said, multi-node consensus sounds good, but who will cover the on-chain costs? If APRO really works, then platforms that rely on crawling data for a living will be trembling collectively. The issue of data real-time performance has long needed attention; I'm just worried it might turn out to be another pretty white paper. Decentralized verification sounds appealing, but what if nodes collude to do evil? It depends on how the node incentive mechanism is designed; otherwise, it's just talk. I am optimistic about this approach, but the completeness of the ecosystem is a concern. To put it simply, it still depends on whether there are real application scenarios willing to pay.

View OriginalReply0

ZKSherlock

· 12h ago

Actually... data from three months ago? Isn't that just gambling, disguised as "analysis"? To put it plainly, it's garbage in, garbage out. The multi-node consensus approach of APRO is somewhat interesting, but the problem is—who verifies these nodes themselves? The trust assumption hasn't been resolved; everything is just theoretical.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanPhantom

· 12h ago

Another project aimed at "solving data problems," sounds pretty good, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT coin. Wait, how does the multi-node consensus verification logic ensure that the nodes themselves don't have issues? This kind of decentralized oracle should have taken off long ago if it could really run smoothly. Coming now feels a bit late. Basically, it's still the old problem of information delay. No matter how many nodes there are, it can't change the inherent speed limit of the chain. I'm just wondering how the APRO incentive mechanism works—whether nodes might also be manipulated like oracles. Feels like we're about to get cut again, but the technical approach isn't a problem.

View OriginalReply0

0xSherlock

· 12h ago

Damn, the data from three months ago is still being bragged about, it's really hard to describe. If this APRO can truly solve the issue of real-time data, it would indeed be a breakthrough. Decentralized verification sounds good, but I'm afraid it's just another castle in the air. When it comes to market prediction, you still need to be cautious. The multi-node consensus mechanism is finally somewhat reliable technically. Wait, could this thing also be exploited for wool pulling?

View OriginalReply0

GasOptimizer

· 12h ago

Another AI oracle, will it really be able to fetch real-time data this time? Or will we have to wait another three months to find out --- Decentralized verification sounds good, but I'm just worried that the nodes are all sleepwalking --- I think the key is whether it can truly prevent data from being tampered with. There are many projects that sound good but lack substance --- Once an automated trading robot gets a "verifiable fact," a new fact appears in the next second, and it can't keep up --- Oracles, once they have issues, pose systemic risks. The reliability of the APRO consensus mechanism depends on real-world testing --- Multi-node consensus? That just means multiple points can fail simultaneously. Is it about dispersing risk or dispersing collapse? --- On-chain data is hard to verify as true or false. Adding an AI oracle doesn't change the fundamental fact that the market is a casino

View OriginalReply0