【BitPush】An interesting trading data has surfaced. A certain wallet deposited $5,000 USDC on Lighter two months ago, then focused on ETH trading, with funds skyrocketing to $133,000—an increase of 26.6 times, with a return rate close to 2560%.
Even more impressive is the performance in the past 7 days. This address accounted for 59% of the transaction volume in Lighter’s ETHUSD order book trading ($1.72 billion), and about 9% of the total number of trades (approximately 115,000 trades). In other words, this guy’s trading volume on the platform is almost crushingly dominant.
A close look at the API and blockchain explorer data reveals that this account trades with zero fees, and aside from the initial $5,000, there are no signs of additional funding. The entire process is built step-by-step through order-matching algorithmic trading. Of course, this is not wash trading, as wash trading requires self-trading with oneself; here, it’s clearly genuine profitable trading. Achieving such results from an initial scale like this is truly thought-provoking.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PanicSeller69
· 3h ago
50,000 to 130,000? Bro, you must have such strong mental resilience... Just looking at the numbers makes me want to cut my losses.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaLeaker
· 10h ago
I'll just say one thing, this is fucking crazy, turning 5k into 130,000—what kind of ball size does that take?
---
Zero fee order execution? How did this guy do it? Teach me, brother.
---
26.6x? Really? Is this a joke?
---
Platform offering zero fees? What the hell is with 59% trading volume? I can't even believe it.
---
Is it purely algorithmic trading stacking up like this? What a badass strategy.
---
Oh my god, 115,000 trades—this must be a robot.
---
Can you multiply this much without adding funds? The market is crazy.
---
Wait, isn't this kind of trading against the rules? Does the platform allow this?
---
Why didn't I think of using Lighter? Missed the small target.
---
What does it mean to exist at a crushing level? It means he did half the work alone.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 10h ago
Laughing out loud, this move is a real-life "leek counterattack" script. Should I learn from it or report it to the police?
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshi
· 10h ago
What about the contract address? I want to see if this is real or just another marketing story.
View OriginalReply0
GmGnSleeper
· 10h ago
Turning $5,000 into $130,000—what kind of magical technique is this? I’m honestly stunned.
Is it true that you can play like this with zero fees? I feel like there’s some trick I haven’t figured out.
Is it really true that this trading volume accounts for 59%? Can one person support that?
When did the Lighter platform become so competitive? I haven’t heard about it before.
But on the other hand, a 2560% return sounds outrageous, and the risk must be equally huge.
This kind of operation where a single person’s trading volume outperforms the entire platform—feels like algorithmic trading is just making a killing.
A 26x multiplier on order eating—bro, is this luck or do you really have some skills?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarm
· 10h ago
Wait, zero fees? Why is this guy getting special treatment? Or is Lighter just giving big players a green light... No matter how transparent the on-chain data is, it can't withstand such outrageous capital concentration.
$5,000 in two months turns into $130,000: An ETH trader's astonishing performance on Lighter
【BitPush】An interesting trading data has surfaced. A certain wallet deposited $5,000 USDC on Lighter two months ago, then focused on ETH trading, with funds skyrocketing to $133,000—an increase of 26.6 times, with a return rate close to 2560%.
Even more impressive is the performance in the past 7 days. This address accounted for 59% of the transaction volume in Lighter’s ETHUSD order book trading ($1.72 billion), and about 9% of the total number of trades (approximately 115,000 trades). In other words, this guy’s trading volume on the platform is almost crushingly dominant.
A close look at the API and blockchain explorer data reveals that this account trades with zero fees, and aside from the initial $5,000, there are no signs of additional funding. The entire process is built step-by-step through order-matching algorithmic trading. Of course, this is not wash trading, as wash trading requires self-trading with oneself; here, it’s clearly genuine profitable trading. Achieving such results from an initial scale like this is truly thought-provoking.