[Crypto World] A wallet operation has recently attracted attention. About two months ago (October 24), it deposited 5,000 USDC into the Lighter platform. And then? Relying solely on ETH trades, the assets surprisingly grew to around $133,000—meaning a 26.6x return, an increase of over 2560%.
Even more astonishing is the performance in the past week. This address accounted for 59% of the ETHUSD market order volume on Lighter, totaling as much as $1.72 billion. Although the number of trades is relatively fewer, it still accounts for about 9% of the total order count, approximately 115,000 trades. Data comes from Lighter’s API and blockchain explorers.
An interesting detail is that this account incurs zero transaction fees when trading, and aside from the initial $5,000, no other fund inflows have been detected. How exactly is this achieved? Some might think it’s wash trading. However, from a technical perspective, this profit is achieved through an order-matching algorithm trading strategy, which does not count as wash trading. Wash trading is characterized by trading with oneself, which is clearly not the case here. Considering the initial capital scale, the performance of this operation is indeed worth paying attention to.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCrybaby
· 15h ago
$5000 with 26.6x leverage? How aggressive does that operation have to be, I'm impressed
---
Zero fees and still able to trade 1.7 billion? Is this an insider or a bug?
---
Wait, is this data real? Seems a bit unbelievable
---
Another story of sudden wealth, time to wake up everyone
---
Bro, this operation looks like playing a game to me, the authenticity is questionable
---
26x return rate? If not bragging, this guy should have retired already
---
Just want to know how the fees became zero, that's the real core
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42
· 15h ago
50,000 to 130,000? Is this guy using X-ray vision... No fees and no capital inflow, isn't that nonsense?
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_watcher
· 15h ago
$5,000 to $133,000? That logic just doesn't add up. There must be something I haven't understood...
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 15h ago
Wow, $5,000 can turn into 130,000? Is this guy an insider?
View OriginalReply0
StillBuyingTheDip
· 15h ago
$5,000 26x leverage? That's impossible... How skilled of a trader do you have to be? I feel like something's off.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStruggler
· 16h ago
Can $5,000 turn into $130,000? This isn't trading, it's cheating. How crazy must the leverage be?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyer
· 16h ago
$5,000 turned into $130,000? That requires such strong risk control, I'm truly impressed.
From $5,000 to $130,000: The mysterious wallet's trading miracle on Lighter
[Crypto World] A wallet operation has recently attracted attention. About two months ago (October 24), it deposited 5,000 USDC into the Lighter platform. And then? Relying solely on ETH trades, the assets surprisingly grew to around $133,000—meaning a 26.6x return, an increase of over 2560%.
Even more astonishing is the performance in the past week. This address accounted for 59% of the ETHUSD market order volume on Lighter, totaling as much as $1.72 billion. Although the number of trades is relatively fewer, it still accounts for about 9% of the total order count, approximately 115,000 trades. Data comes from Lighter’s API and blockchain explorers.
An interesting detail is that this account incurs zero transaction fees when trading, and aside from the initial $5,000, no other fund inflows have been detected. How exactly is this achieved? Some might think it’s wash trading. However, from a technical perspective, this profit is achieved through an order-matching algorithm trading strategy, which does not count as wash trading. Wash trading is characterized by trading with oneself, which is clearly not the case here. Considering the initial capital scale, the performance of this operation is indeed worth paying attention to.