2025-12-30 01:22:03

The gap keeps widening. While most DeFi projects are only now experimenting with revenue-sharing mechanisms, one protocol has already mastered the ve-tokenomics playbook. The difference? Early movers who got the model right don't just participate in trends—they define them. Their approach to incentivizing long-term token holders and aligning governance rewards with protocol revenue isn't just ahead; it's operating on a different timeline altogether. As the space matures, this structural advantage compounds. Projects jumping in now are essentially playing catch-up with a framework that's been battle-tested for years.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ETHReserveBank

· 15h ago

ve-tokenomics has been understood for a long time; latecomers can only watch in vain --- First-mover advantage in DeFi is the key, don’t talk about profit sharing --- Wait, isn’t this just the curve finance model? --- The difficulty in breaking the deadlock lies here; innovative models are right there, copying them doesn’t feel good --- Early layout has already secured the win; entering now is a bit late, huh --- I like the idea of different timelines; it truly is a two-dimensional competition --- Structural advantages stacking? This is about crushing the rhythm --- Years of practical testing show that this barrier is really quite thick --- How long does it take for latecomers to catch up, five years? Ten years? --- The ve mechanism should have become standard by now; projects still in trial and error really need to reflect

View OriginalReply0

LayoffMiner