The engineering approach of privacy pathways is worth pondering. The true breakthrough is not about finding ways to better hide data, but about changing the logic of computation and verification.
The core innovation lies here: performing complex calculations locally and only submitting the verification results to the chain. In this way, the entire cost structure is reorganized—there's no need to rerun expensive computations on the chain, only to verify the correctness of the results.
From a threat model perspective, this also changes the rules of the game. Computation is done locally, meaning fewer intermediate steps and higher system predictability. Using a more streamlined process and stronger reproducibility, it ensures the certainty of results. Essentially, this is a design philosophy focused on reliability and efficiency—not avoiding problems, but fundamentally redesigning the way problems are solved.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenCreatorOP
· 15h ago
This idea is indeed brilliant. Local verification on the chain directly cuts the cost in half. Who would still be so foolish to verify on the chain?
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 15h ago
This idea is indeed brilliant. Running calculations locally only requires submitting verification results, completely breaking the cost structure.
It's really just a different perspective on the problem—it's not about piling up privacy tricks, but about changing the architectural logic.
Hey, do you think this方案 can really withstand the attack surface of on-chain verification? It seems like it still depends on the specific implementation.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 15h ago
Local computation, on-chain verification... sounds good, but who will ensure that no one tampers with the local side?
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreets
· 15h ago
Well said, this is the right way. Most projects just pile up privacy terms for marketing without thinking about how to truly reduce costs and improve efficiency. Moving computations to local execution and only verifying results on the chain—this is a good move— the gas saved is the arbitrage space, understand?
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerWallet
· 15h ago
This idea is indeed brilliant. Local computation and on-chain verification flip the cost issue directly.
View OriginalReply0
GovernancePretender
· 15h ago
Hmm, this idea is indeed brilliant. Moving the computation locally directly reduces costs.
The engineering approach of privacy pathways is worth pondering. The true breakthrough is not about finding ways to better hide data, but about changing the logic of computation and verification.
The core innovation lies here: performing complex calculations locally and only submitting the verification results to the chain. In this way, the entire cost structure is reorganized—there's no need to rerun expensive computations on the chain, only to verify the correctness of the results.
From a threat model perspective, this also changes the rules of the game. Computation is done locally, meaning fewer intermediate steps and higher system predictability. Using a more streamlined process and stronger reproducibility, it ensures the certainty of results. Essentially, this is a design philosophy focused on reliability and efficiency—not avoiding problems, but fundamentally redesigning the way problems are solved.