2025-12-30 01:25:29

Cypherpunk—some treat it as just another buzzword, a slick label to slap on projects. But then there are those who genuinely believe in it, who see the whole thing as a mission to reshape how the world handles money and privacy. Two very different camps with very different endgames.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ForkMaster

· 9h ago

Honestly, how many people truly believe in punk? They're all just using it as a wealth password to hype. I've raised three kids over the years and have seen through all the tricks—it's just that much.

View OriginalReply0

FOMOmonster

· 9h ago

Really, the term "cypherpunk" is being overused now, as if any project dares to slap that label on it... But on the other hand, it's the true believers who are really doing great things.

View OriginalReply0

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 9h ago

Both sides are hyping it up, but where are the real health factors? Projects wrapped in buzzwords, with leverage maxed out, can be liquidated in minutes. Risk control thresholds should have been raised long ago.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTrendSister

· 9h ago

Really, there are many projects now claiming to be cypherpunk, but most of them are just a guise to scam investors.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-75ee51e7

· 9h ago

Real cypherpunks and those shell companies are fundamentally two different species.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 9h ago

Really, the term "cypherpunk" is now being overused to the point of absurdity... A bunch of projects slap this label on and just want to cash in, it's hilarious.

View OriginalReply0