The first time I saw a platform launch a predictive trading on stablecoin de-pegging, at first glance there didn't seem to be anything wrong, but I always felt something was off—like someone insisting on a betting game about when Bitcoin will hit zero.
What's even more amusing is that a leading exchange just launched a USD1 stablecoin investment product with an annualized return of 20%, and then on the same platform, they listed a USD1 de-pegging prediction. This move is indeed a bit ironic.
However, after studying the rules carefully, I realized that this is not just a figment of imagination. The condition for predicting de-pegging is: during the observation period, at any moment, as long as the highest price of 24 consecutive 1-hour K-lines is below 0.98 (i.e., 0.97999 or lower), the market will settle as "Yes." It sounds quite strict, but considering the scale of that investment product, if after maturity a leading exchange doesn't follow up with renewal arrangements, the pressure from a concentrated sell-off could really push the price below 0.98. Such a scenario is not impossible.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeLover
· 10h ago
This exchange has really started playing favorites, selling financial products while simultaneously trying to offload the anchor market... Isn't this just gambling?
View OriginalReply0
LucidSleepwalker
· 10h ago
Hmm... this operation is indeed a bit suspicious. Selling financial products while offloading the anchor position, to be honest, feels a bit uncomfortable.
View OriginalReply0
EternalMiner
· 10h ago
Issuing your own stablecoin and running your own de-pegging gambling game—doesn't that mean the house is both the referee and the player?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 10h ago
I can't keep this up anymore. Selling financial products while simultaneously escaping the anchor betting scheme—aren't you just betting against yourself?
The first time I saw a platform launch a predictive trading on stablecoin de-pegging, at first glance there didn't seem to be anything wrong, but I always felt something was off—like someone insisting on a betting game about when Bitcoin will hit zero.
What's even more amusing is that a leading exchange just launched a USD1 stablecoin investment product with an annualized return of 20%, and then on the same platform, they listed a USD1 de-pegging prediction. This move is indeed a bit ironic.
However, after studying the rules carefully, I realized that this is not just a figment of imagination. The condition for predicting de-pegging is: during the observation period, at any moment, as long as the highest price of 24 consecutive 1-hour K-lines is below 0.98 (i.e., 0.97999 or lower), the market will settle as "Yes." It sounds quite strict, but considering the scale of that investment product, if after maturity a leading exchange doesn't follow up with renewal arrangements, the pressure from a concentrated sell-off could really push the price below 0.98. Such a scenario is not impossible.