Are there new stories in the public chain narrative? Who will be the protagonist in the next cycle?
My view is: each generation of public chains revolves around the concept of "value."
The earliest ones like Bitcoin and Dogecoin addressed the problem of going from nothing to something—how to generate value on the blockchain, relying on on-chain consensus and the accumulation of attention. This was the first wave.
Later, Ethereum, SOL, and BNB emerged, and the game changed to who can transfer value faster and more stably. During those years, the focus was on TPS, security, and cost—who had better performance metrics could "siphon" value. This was the second wave.
Now? The track has changed. The third-generation public chains are no longer about speed but about whether they can truly store value. Most assets on the first two generations of chains are driven by consensus and attention, making them easy to symbolically process. But real-world assets are different—complex rules, numerous details, not something that can be simply fitted into a standard protocol. Look at those DePIN projects, most of which haven't survived, and that illustrates this point.
A few projects have made breakthroughs in this direction. One is an L1 public chain targeting AI assets; currently, market makers are experiencing changes, and it remains to be seen whether new funding will come in. Another is a RWA public chain supported by a major exchange, exploring on-chain real-world assets. There’s also a rising intellectual property public chain aiming to establish a new asset rights confirmation system in the IP field.
In the next market cycle, capital attention in the public chain sector will gradually shift toward store-of-value public chains—that's the main trend.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TooScaredToSell
· 9h ago
Store of value? Sounds good, but I've seen the endings of those DePIN projects, and they all end up cold.
RWA public chains have been heard a thousand times, but which ones can truly be implemented?
View OriginalReply0
ConsensusDissenter
· 9h ago
It sounds like another cycle of storytelling... But why do I feel like the second wave hasn't even been fully understood before the third wave is already being hyped?
As for RWA, honestly, is it enough to just have an exchange endorse it? The real key is whether it can actually be implemented.
DePIN projects are failing one after another, which actually highlights the problem — it's not that public blockchains are inadequate, but that the application layer hasn't figured out how to do it.
Store of value? First, ask how many people are truly willing to put real-world assets on the chain...
The IP public chain is a new concept, but we'll see if it can survive the next bear market.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGwei
· 9h ago
Prepaid public chains? Sounds good, but isn't it just hype again? After all these years of bringing real assets onto the blockchain, why is it still just a castle in the air?
View OriginalReply0
AlgoAlchemist
· 9h ago
Prepaid public chains? Sounds like another cycle of new narratives. Ultimately, who can survive until the end depends on ecosystem development.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 9h ago
I agree with the logic of storing value, but can RWA public chains really work? Feels mostly theoretical and not practical.
---
DePIN has died off, which shows that bringing real-world assets on-chain isn't that simple. Don't be fooled by the narrative.
---
AI asset L1 market maker changes... this signal is worth paying attention to, it might have a new owner soon.
---
The speed race is over; now it's about who can pack the most features. Interesting.
---
Intellectual property rights confirmation sounds good, but I'm worried it might just be another concept coin.
---
Can this value storage wave be more aggressive than BTC? Not really convinced.
---
I'm paying attention to RWA; just don't know how many real assets can actually be onboarded.
Are there new stories in the public chain narrative? Who will be the protagonist in the next cycle?
My view is: each generation of public chains revolves around the concept of "value."
The earliest ones like Bitcoin and Dogecoin addressed the problem of going from nothing to something—how to generate value on the blockchain, relying on on-chain consensus and the accumulation of attention. This was the first wave.
Later, Ethereum, SOL, and BNB emerged, and the game changed to who can transfer value faster and more stably. During those years, the focus was on TPS, security, and cost—who had better performance metrics could "siphon" value. This was the second wave.
Now? The track has changed. The third-generation public chains are no longer about speed but about whether they can truly store value. Most assets on the first two generations of chains are driven by consensus and attention, making them easy to symbolically process. But real-world assets are different—complex rules, numerous details, not something that can be simply fitted into a standard protocol. Look at those DePIN projects, most of which haven't survived, and that illustrates this point.
A few projects have made breakthroughs in this direction. One is an L1 public chain targeting AI assets; currently, market makers are experiencing changes, and it remains to be seen whether new funding will come in. Another is a RWA public chain supported by a major exchange, exploring on-chain real-world assets. There’s also a rising intellectual property public chain aiming to establish a new asset rights confirmation system in the IP field.
In the next market cycle, capital attention in the public chain sector will gradually shift toward store-of-value public chains—that's the main trend.