2025-12-30 03:24:13

Yesterday, the TIMI incident was really upsetting, and today a new coin appeared out of nowhere. If I had known earlier, I wouldn't have bothered with the old coins. I heard there was a preview this time, so I would have adjusted my strategy earlier. Hopefully, today's distribution will be a bit lower, so I can at least get some.

Speaking of today's opportunities, the oooo project is worth paying attention to — an AI-driven cross-chain bridging platform that looks quite innovative. The total supply is 1 billion tokens, with an initial circulation of 15%. It is expected to open around 4 PM, with an average price of about 240 points, and a price expectation between 30-50U.

If you're planning to operate, here’s my advice: for stable returns, consider farming LISA or ESPORTS, with a single transaction size of around 500U being suitable. I personally farmed LISA at 16 points. Recently, the airdrop has not been very large, so if you pursue a steady return, accepting the 15-point position is also fine, and the cost-performance ratio is actually quite good.

OOOO-20,28%

ESPORTS-4,49%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LuckyHashValue

· 9h ago

Another new coin and airdrop, this wave looks pretty interesting TIMI's situation yesterday was indeed a pain, but oooo's AI cross-chain approach is really fresh, just not sure if it will break the offering again at the opening The average price of 240 points feels acceptable, mainly depends on the allocation at 4 PM, luck plays a big role The 16-minute LISA minting operation is okay, but I still want to wait and see if there's a lower entry point

View OriginalReply0

GoldDiggerDuck

· 9h ago

New coins are here again, TIMI still hasn't recovered Yesterday was exhausting, how about this time oooo? Is anyone participating? Wait, the average price is 240 points... still need to be cautious I also want to buy LISA, but this wave's fluctuation isn't really big

View OriginalReply0

RiddleMaster

· 9h ago

Oh man, TIMI's recent moves are really exhausting. Now there's a new product again. I should have saved some bullets earlier. oooo This thing looks pretty decent. The cross-chain setup is indeed interesting, but I wonder if it's just another scheme to cut the leeks. At a price of 240 points, I think it's worth trying out. Anyway, just as a learning fee.

View OriginalReply0

TradFiRefugee

· 9h ago

New coins are coming again, TIMI this wave is indeed fantastic. If I had known earlier, I would have held back. An average price of 240 points, it feels like another big show. Should I gamble on this move? I think the 15-point position is enough. If you insist on pursuing perfection, it’s exhausting.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 9h ago

New coin again? Looks like it's time to fill the TIMI pit from yesterday. oooo this is indeed interesting—a combination of cross-chain bridging and AI, but the 15% circulating ratio feels a bit risky. The average price at 240 points, I think it's average; let's wait and see if it can go lower before buying.

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 9h ago

Uh, it's the same old trick. Can a preview help you avoid a trap? That's easy to say; information asymmetry always exists. Don't deceive yourself. The key point is that the circulation share of thisoooo is only 15%. With such a small initial pool, the room for manipulation is limited, and I calculated that the risk factor is actually quite high. The 240-point average price seems reasonable, but dare to go in without tracing the source chain? I need to verify node stability before making a decision. A single operation of 500U is no problem, but I have reservations about the 15-16 point position. Without confirming system reliability, blindly pursuing cost performance is gambling. This is not a rational consensus mechanism.

View OriginalReply0