After things quieted down, it's worth asking: what was mayhem mode really trying to achieve? The concept felt off from the start—essentially pitting traders against algorithmic opponents when volume was already bottoming out. But here's what stuck with me: we're competing against bots that can generate infinite token supply on demand, while we operate under normal constraints. That's fundamentally unbalanced. Was this just a PvE experiment with randomized opponents, or is it a testing ground for something bigger down the line? The mechanics suggest one side has structural advantages the other simply can't match.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BTCBeliefStation
· 10h ago
Players and robots are simply not on the same starting line; this design is outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlock
· 10h ago
ngl Mayhem Mode is just a trap. Why are we fighting against bots that infinitely print coins? Isn't this clearly bullying?
View OriginalReply0
RektRecovery
· 10h ago
lmao infinite token supply vs normal constraints... i warned about this asymmetric garbage from day one. classic exploit pattern dressed up as "game mechanics." predictable vulnerability, honestly. they're literally testing whether retail can get systematically drained before rolling out the real product. post-mortem reveals this one.
Reply0
NftBankruptcyClub
· 10h ago
NGL, this mechanism is ridiculous. How can we possibly win against bots... Infinite coin farming vs limited funds, isn't this just asking for trouble?
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichMaker
· 10h ago
To be honest, this mechanism is ridiculous. We're fighting against robots that can create coins out of thin air—how is that fair?
View OriginalReply0
FallingLeaf
· 10h ago
It's all a scam. Robots have unlimited supply, and we still have to follow the rules. Who can beat that?
After things quieted down, it's worth asking: what was mayhem mode really trying to achieve? The concept felt off from the start—essentially pitting traders against algorithmic opponents when volume was already bottoming out. But here's what stuck with me: we're competing against bots that can generate infinite token supply on demand, while we operate under normal constraints. That's fundamentally unbalanced. Was this just a PvE experiment with randomized opponents, or is it a testing ground for something bigger down the line? The mechanics suggest one side has structural advantages the other simply can't match.