2025-12-30 03:28:20

Interestingly, Manus founder Xiao Hong's choices can be considered textbook-level—he has ridden the wave of AI innovation while not missing out on the current cryptocurrency cycle. According to social media disclosures, he is even a BTC holder.

This "dual-engine" holding strategy is becoming increasingly common in the startup world. On one hand, there is the urgency of AI application implementation; on the other hand, there is recognition of the long-term value of crypto assets. Some say it's luck, but more accurately, it's an insight into technological trends—both tracks represent major future growth directions.

Whether driven by faith or strategy, entrepreneurs like Xiao Hong answer a question with their actions: why do top builders often have a positive outlook on both AI and Crypto?

BTC0,24%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ContractExplorer

· 7h ago

Dual-engine strategy is impressive, but to be honest, it still depends on whether it can be implemented later.

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 7h ago

Hi, that's why I say smart people are "grasping both hands"... AI is indeed hot right now, but those with true foresight still diversify their chips into crypto. BTC will never deceive you.

View OriginalReply0

ApeWithNoFear

· 7h ago

Cough, the dual-engine strategy sounds fancy, but basically it's just betting on both sides. Anyway, if you win, you're a prophet.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatorFlash

· 7h ago

Dual engines are indeed attractive, but the collateralization ratio must be closely monitored, as fluctuations can directly trigger liquidation risk. The combination of BTC holders and AI entrepreneurs seems to have diversified risk control, but in reality, their lending positions are probably maxed out. To put it simply, the bets are still concentrated on high growth expectations, and even market fluctuations of 0.37% can cause tension. Are top builders optimistic about the dual-track approach? I think it's more about leverage planning... Who will bear the risk premium? This kind of holding logic is a bit dangerous; once the liquidation threshold is triggered, both sides will have to run. However, it must be acknowledged that with proper insight, the dual engines can achieve exponential growth... The key is still designing a good risk control mechanism.

View OriginalReply0

MevShadowranger

· 7h ago

Dual-track winner, this trick is indeed effective

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhilosopher

· 7h ago

Dual-engine players, now that's truly living life to the fullest --- Xiao Hong's skills are incredibly steady, AI+BTC, one by one, there's no need to all in on one side --- Basically, those who understand the cycle won't just chew on the bones when it's time to eat meat --- What does textbook-level mean... this is the standard for realists --- The choices of top builders boil down to two words: not stupid --- So the question is, what are those entrepreneurs who only all in on one track thinking? --- With a deeper understanding, others are playing chess, some are still looking at one move --- This strategy three years ago was called luck; now it's just basic operation

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 7h ago

The consultation records show that this "dual-engine" strategy appears impressive on the surface, but clinical performance still needs further observation—how much of it is luck, and can that really be quantified?

View OriginalReply0