2025-12-30 04:24:40

Regarding AI tokens, be clear about one thing.

Social buzz and a genuine community are completely different.

Data shows that AI-related tokens like Bittensor, ASI, Render, and QUBIC all have impressive social activity. But there's a problem—flashy numbers often mask the true quality of the community.

Looking only at retweets and likes on X, you can't see whether a project's ecosystem is truly healthy. How should you judge a genuine community? By the developer engagement, the activity in governance discussions, and user retention rates. In other words, social metrics can tell you how popular a project is, but they can't tell you how long it will last.

So when evaluating these AI concept projects, don't just focus on the rankings. Dig deeper into the ecosystem development and user stickiness behind them—that's the key to distinguishing authenticity from falsehood.

TAO-1,16%

ASI0,76%

QUBIC-4,25%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoFortuneTeller

· 6h ago

I've already said it, good-looking data doesn't mean the project is viable. Let me see again the retweet counts of those AI coins, and I might faint. Developer activity is the real gold and silver. Social buzz is too easy to fake; we need to look at ecosystem retention. It's Bittensor, ASI again... who are they going to cut this round?

View OriginalReply0

ChainSpy

· 6h ago

Social popularity is just a mirror that reveals the true nature; beautiful data is nice, but whether the ecosystem can survive is the real question.

View OriginalReply0

GweiWatcher

· 6h ago

Social data is overrated; what really matters is the frequency of GitHub commits and whether governance proposals are genuinely being discussed.

View OriginalReply0

probably_nothing_anon

· 6h ago

Social data looks good, but what about the actual retention rate? That's the key to seeing through the project.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d

· 6h ago

Awake, social buzz = a good signal for harvesting profits. I've understood this logic long ago. Don't just look at the retweets of those AI tokens; the number of projects that can truly survive is pitifully small. Are there still few cases of developers fleeing? Relying solely on community buzz can't hold things up at all.

View OriginalReply0

SerumSquirrel

· 6h ago

NGL, this is why a bunch of people go all-in on AI coins and end up losing everything. Social buzz ≠ ecosystem. Wake up, everyone.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityNinja

· 6h ago

That's right, the hype around these AI coins has definitely been exaggerated. A bunch of likes and shares, what's the use? The key is whether the ecosystem can really get off the ground. How active are the developers on Bittensor? Who knows? Anyway, I don't believe that social media buzz alone can determine long-term success.

View OriginalReply0