2025-12-30 04:25:25

Recently, I achieved a rollover operation from 3U to 96U in trading, with a gain of about 30 times. However, to be honest, this process is not stable, with large fluctuations, and a slight misstep can easily lead to significant drawdowns.

Later, I summarized a relatively reliable approach: mainly focusing on mainstream coins and those with larger capital volumes. These assets have good liquidity and small slippage. In terms of timeframes, I mainly use the 1-hour and 4-hour cycles — they can capture swing opportunities while avoiding the trap of overtrading.

For indicator configuration, I use a combination of MACD, RSI, and KDJ. The key is that I adjusted the MACD parameters, halving the standard values, so the signals are more sensitive and accurate. Relying solely on one indicator can lead to being trapped; using three indicators for mutual verification can improve the win rate.

But to be honest, although this method is effective, it requires a lot of time to monitor the market. Recently, I shifted my focus to MT5 quantitative trading, aiming to solve the timing issue with programming and let the strategy execute automatically.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeSobber

· 12h ago

3U to 96U sounds pretty attractive, but what about the actual trading experience? I think this is just a manifestation of gambler mentality; survivor bias is too severe. MACD parameters halved... Honestly, I've heard this kind of fine-tuning too many times, and in the end, it all gets wiped out by black swan events. Might as well accept fate. Mainstream coins have good liquidity, which is correct, but do you think using 1H and 4H timeframes can avoid overtrading? Come on, these two periods are actually the easiest to be manipulated; I’ve seen many people get caught here. Quantitative strategies sound good, but code bugs can also wipe you out. Have you considered this possibility? 30x leverage... interesting, but I want to know more about your mindset during drawdowns—that's the real issue. I agree with the indicator combination validation, but the problem is, what if all three give false signals? You need to think this through.

View OriginalReply0

SelfMadeRuggee

· 12h ago

30x leverage? Damn, but how many lucky breaks does it take to survive until now... Reducing the MACD parameters by half is worth a try, but it still feels easy to get fooled by false signals. Automation on MT5 is the real way out; monitoring manually will eventually blow your mind. Using three indicators to verify this idea is pretty good, saving you from always buying at high levels. Rolling positions so aggressively—how can you sleep at night... I really respect that.

View OriginalReply0

nft_widow

· 12h ago

3U to 96U sounds great, but to be honest, how crazy this fluctuation is... one misstep and you're back to square one. It's more reliable to stick with mainstream coins, don't always think about digging for treasures in small altcoins. Changing the MACD parameters to half the value is indeed an idea, but I think the more important thing is mindset; indicators can never deceive us. Watching the market all the time is exhausting, quantitative trading is the right way, isn't it better to get on board early with automated trading? 30x leverage is good, but the stress behind it must be killing people. I'll stick to a steady approach.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyMiner

· 12h ago

A 3U to 96U range sounds intense, but this fluctuation really... requires a steel-hearted person to handle it. Reducing the MACD parameters by half? That move is a bit showy, but on the other hand, it still needs more validation to be reliable. Watching the market all the time is exhausting; quantitative trading is indeed the way out, it all depends on whether the backtest data is convincing. 30x leverage sounds great, but in practice, it probably means endless跌停 and flash crashes repeatedly tormenting traders. It's true that mainstream coins have small slippage, provided your judgment isn't too bad... This set of indicator combinations is a bit old-fashioned; those who play with this have long been rubbed out by the market.

View OriginalReply0