From March 14 to 15, 2025, three projects—Starknet (STRK), Sei (SEI), and Connex (CONX)—successively triggered token unlock mechanisms, releasing a total of over $80 million in circulation. Among them, Connex’s unlock volume reached 376.3% of its existing circulating supply, a figure far exceeding typical project unlock ratios, raising market concerns about short-term supply and demand imbalances.
Differentiated Narratives of Unlock Logic
Looking at specific projects, the 64 million STRK (approximately $14 million) unlocked by Starknet is part of a linear release plan for the team and investors, with tokenomics designed to buffer release pressures through phased releases; the 220 million SEI (about $60.5 million) released by Sei mainly went to early private investors, who typically have stronger profit-taking motivations; meanwhile, the 376.3% circulation unlock of Connex exposes flaws in the project’s initial distribution mechanism—newly released tokens may form a “liquidity dam” in the short term.
Market reactions validate this differentiation: the volatility of STRK’s price within 24 hours after unlock was only 5.2%, significantly lower than Sei’s 11.7% and Connex’s 38.4%. This indicates that mature projects’ token release mechanisms can mitigate shocks through market expectation management, whereas projects with rapid circulation expansion face short-term failures in price discovery mechanisms.
Investor Behavior Game Map
Three typical strategies emerged from this event:
Arbitrage Trading: Some quantitative funds established short positions before unlock, using futures markets to hedge against spot selling pressure;
Value Capture Operations: Long-term investors focus on Starknet ecosystem developments, viewing price retracements as opportunities to increase holdings;
Panic Selling: Small and medium investors triggered stop-loss orders during Connex’s sharp decline, creating a spiral downward effect.
This differentiation reveals an increasing maturity in the crypto market—institutional investors can now manage unlock risks through derivatives, while retail investors remain primarily driven by emotions.
Stress Testing of Token Economics
This concentrated unlock event essentially serves as a stress test for project token distribution mechanisms. Starknet maintained market confidence through preset linear release rules, with its developer activity index increasing by 7% during the unlock week; in contrast, Connex’s trust collapsed due to the lack of clear token burn or lock-up plans. This provides an important industry insight: a reasonable token release pace is more effective in maintaining project value than short-term market cap management.
The market is voting with real money: projects that deeply integrate tokenomics design with ecosystem development are building moats through bull and bear cycles; those relying on high circulation to create false prosperity will ultimately be exposed when liquidity recedes.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Market Competition Under the Wave of Cryptocurrency Exchange Token Unlocks: How Does the Supply and Demand Balance Tilt?
Microcosm of Liquidity Shocks
From March 14 to 15, 2025, three projects—Starknet (STRK), Sei (SEI), and Connex (CONX)—successively triggered token unlock mechanisms, releasing a total of over $80 million in circulation. Among them, Connex’s unlock volume reached 376.3% of its existing circulating supply, a figure far exceeding typical project unlock ratios, raising market concerns about short-term supply and demand imbalances.
Differentiated Narratives of Unlock Logic
Looking at specific projects, the 64 million STRK (approximately $14 million) unlocked by Starknet is part of a linear release plan for the team and investors, with tokenomics designed to buffer release pressures through phased releases; the 220 million SEI (about $60.5 million) released by Sei mainly went to early private investors, who typically have stronger profit-taking motivations; meanwhile, the 376.3% circulation unlock of Connex exposes flaws in the project’s initial distribution mechanism—newly released tokens may form a “liquidity dam” in the short term.
Market reactions validate this differentiation: the volatility of STRK’s price within 24 hours after unlock was only 5.2%, significantly lower than Sei’s 11.7% and Connex’s 38.4%. This indicates that mature projects’ token release mechanisms can mitigate shocks through market expectation management, whereas projects with rapid circulation expansion face short-term failures in price discovery mechanisms.
Investor Behavior Game Map
Three typical strategies emerged from this event:
Arbitrage Trading: Some quantitative funds established short positions before unlock, using futures markets to hedge against spot selling pressure;
Value Capture Operations: Long-term investors focus on Starknet ecosystem developments, viewing price retracements as opportunities to increase holdings;
Panic Selling: Small and medium investors triggered stop-loss orders during Connex’s sharp decline, creating a spiral downward effect.
This differentiation reveals an increasing maturity in the crypto market—institutional investors can now manage unlock risks through derivatives, while retail investors remain primarily driven by emotions.
Stress Testing of Token Economics
This concentrated unlock event essentially serves as a stress test for project token distribution mechanisms. Starknet maintained market confidence through preset linear release rules, with its developer activity index increasing by 7% during the unlock week; in contrast, Connex’s trust collapsed due to the lack of clear token burn or lock-up plans. This provides an important industry insight: a reasonable token release pace is more effective in maintaining project value than short-term market cap management.
The market is voting with real money: projects that deeply integrate tokenomics design with ecosystem development are building moats through bull and bear cycles; those relying on high circulation to create false prosperity will ultimately be exposed when liquidity recedes.