Recently, I have been researching the RWA track. To be honest, most projects on the market are still at the stage of "wrapping real-world assets with on-chain concepts." No matter how exquisite the packaging or how complex the architecture, the actual cash flow generated is often vague.
It wasn't until I delved into the SAIL project that I had a different feeling for the first time—this is not just storytelling; they are truly bringing the "profit-making" aspect onto the chain.
SAIL's logic is completely different from other projects. It doesn't rely on token appreciation to attract users, nor does it offer the illusion of high yields like hundreds of percent APR. Its model is built on real income sources—each profit can be traced back to specific asset endpoints and business flows.
This is what RWA should look like. Not layered financial engineering packaging, but connecting real, cash-flow-generating assets with blockchain's transparency and liquidity. It may not look as "sexy" as those flashy conceptual projects, but it wins with tangibility, verifiability, and real value.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DaoTherapy
· 10h ago
Really, after a year of RWA, I've become numb to it, and most projects are indeed just making things up. SAIL is different; the cash flow is tangible and measurable. That's what I call pragmatic.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfast
· 10h ago
Real cash flow is indeed scarce, and most RWA are just nesting dolls.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_APY_2000
· 10h ago
Honestly, I've seen too many RWA projects boast over the past two years, and they have no idea about cash flow.
SAIL is indeed somewhat interesting, not relying on crypto trading to cut leeks, it has some substance.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectiveBing
· 10h ago
Honestly, RWA is currently just a big hype with a lot of talk. After looking at a bunch of projects, it seems they are all just storytelling, and very few are truly implementable.
I've also been paying attention to SAIL. It’s indeed different, with clear and verifiable cash flow, unlike others that hype wildly but end up with nothing.
Still, as I always say, the most lacking thing in the crypto space is authenticity, which is a thousand times more important than concepts.
But wait, does SAIL really have a stable income source now? Is it possible that it’s just packaged in a different way? We need to keep observing.
Recently, I have been researching the RWA track. To be honest, most projects on the market are still at the stage of "wrapping real-world assets with on-chain concepts." No matter how exquisite the packaging or how complex the architecture, the actual cash flow generated is often vague.
It wasn't until I delved into the SAIL project that I had a different feeling for the first time—this is not just storytelling; they are truly bringing the "profit-making" aspect onto the chain.
SAIL's logic is completely different from other projects. It doesn't rely on token appreciation to attract users, nor does it offer the illusion of high yields like hundreds of percent APR. Its model is built on real income sources—each profit can be traced back to specific asset endpoints and business flows.
This is what RWA should look like. Not layered financial engineering packaging, but connecting real, cash-flow-generating assets with blockchain's transparency and liquidity. It may not look as "sexy" as those flashy conceptual projects, but it wins with tangibility, verifiability, and real value.