In 2025, the DEX ecosystem discussion still revolves around TVL numbers— the larger the scale, the louder the voice, but the actual value remains uncertain. From a different perspective, liquidity should be closer to real trading needs. Dynamic Liquidity Market Making Pools (DLMM) keep funds active, with trading volume appearing where users actually trade, avoiding liquidity fragmentation caused by manual resets. This is the true reflection of DEX competitiveness—not just on paper, but where actual trading occurs.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MissingSatsvip
· 19h ago
The TVL number game should have gone bankrupt long ago; the truly useful DEXs focus on where the trades actually happen.
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDovip
· 12-30 05:54
The way of counting TVL numbers really needs to be changed; the DLMM approach is indeed more down-to-earth.
View OriginalReply0
NftMetaversePaintervip
· 12-30 05:50
actually, the true algorithmic elegance here lies in how dlmm fundamentally reorients liquidity provision through computational optimization rather than mere tvl theater... this is what i've been exploring in my generative liquidity series
Reply0
BearMarketMonkvip
· 12-30 05:41
The TVL number game should have gone bankrupt long ago. Basically, it's just about who’s really executing transactions.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)