I recently came across a long article discussing a very interesting phenomenon——you see the economic data looking great, with GDP growth and declining unemployment, but people's lives are still tight. Earning $100,000 a year and still feeling poor—what's really going on?
The problem actually lies in the tools we use to measure wealth and poverty. The official poverty line in the US is set at an annual income of $31,200 (for a family of four). As long as you exceed this number, statistically, you're not considered poor. Sounds good, but this measure was created in 1963.
Back then, the logic was simple and crude: a family spends about one-third of their income on food, so they calculated the minimum food cost and multiplied it by three—that's how the poverty line was determined.
But the world has changed over the years. Food prices have steadily decreased, but what about housing, healthcare, and childcare costs? That's a different story. Think about what it takes to live decently in society today—having a place to live, a car, caring for children, access to medical care when sick—these basic needs costs have skyrocketed. Recalculating based on current living standards, the true poverty line isn't just over $30,000 but around $140,000, roughly 1 million RMB. That’s the real threshold for barely living a decent life in modern society.
No wonder so many people feel the data looks good, but life is still tough. The measuring stick is way outdated.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVSandwichMaker
· 10h ago
Damn it, using a ruler from 1963 to measure life in 2024, isn't that bullshit?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 10h ago
Wow, I can't believe the poverty line data. Measuring with a 1963 ruler? Wake up.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 10h ago
Really, the statistics are a joke. Is $140,000 really the true poverty line? Then I guess I might as well give up on life.
View OriginalReply0
PumpBeforeRug
· 10h ago
Damn, now I get it. No wonder I’m still broke with an annual salary of 120,000. Turns out the way they calculate it is just fucking ridiculous.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 10h ago
Although this is an article about the US economy, as a metaverse landlord, I want to comment from a Web3 perspective. First, I strongly agree with the author's point — traditional metrics are now completely outdated. Whether it's GDP or the poverty line, these data are defined by centralized institutions, which often represent the interests of the vested parties.
In the Web3 world, we are trying to establish new economic models. Through innovations like DeFi, DAOs, and NFTs, we can create more transparent and fair ways to measure wealth. For example, a regular person participating in a DAO to obtain governance tokens might find their value far surpassing traditional salary measurements.
However, this also makes me wonder — will virtual real estate in the metaverse face the same issues? Could the virtual world’s real estate bubble be more severe than in the real world? It’s worth pondering.
In summary, I believe that whether in the real or virtual world, we need to update our measurement standards. Although the crypto world is volatile, it at least provides opportunities for ordinary people to participate.
I hope to see more innovative economic models emerge in the future.
I recently came across a long article discussing a very interesting phenomenon——you see the economic data looking great, with GDP growth and declining unemployment, but people's lives are still tight. Earning $100,000 a year and still feeling poor—what's really going on?
The problem actually lies in the tools we use to measure wealth and poverty. The official poverty line in the US is set at an annual income of $31,200 (for a family of four). As long as you exceed this number, statistically, you're not considered poor. Sounds good, but this measure was created in 1963.
Back then, the logic was simple and crude: a family spends about one-third of their income on food, so they calculated the minimum food cost and multiplied it by three—that's how the poverty line was determined.
But the world has changed over the years. Food prices have steadily decreased, but what about housing, healthcare, and childcare costs? That's a different story. Think about what it takes to live decently in society today—having a place to live, a car, caring for children, access to medical care when sick—these basic needs costs have skyrocketed. Recalculating based on current living standards, the true poverty line isn't just over $30,000 but around $140,000, roughly 1 million RMB. That’s the real threshold for barely living a decent life in modern society.
No wonder so many people feel the data looks good, but life is still tough. The measuring stick is way outdated.