Thinking of a friend I've collaborated with for over twenty years, this guy's background is quite interesting—dual expertise in finance and economics. His daily routine involves reading news, analyzing reports, and researching data. This habit, cultivated over decades, makes opportunities seem almost trivial to him. But because of this, one common flaw of his becomes especially noticeable: his execution ability is always just a bit off. Entering the market too early or too late, exiting at the wrong time—those opportunities that look huge often yield only modest returns, and he’s never experienced that thrill of catching a fish from start to finish.
The turning point began in February this year. He adopted a complete quantitative trading system, but the process was interesting—he didn’t just hand everything over to the system; he maintained a hybrid approach. First, relying on his professional experience and fundamental analysis to determine whether to go long or short on a certain asset, then he would set the conditions for the system to execute. Since then, he’s been comfortable trading indices, rebar, iron ore, gold, silver, and crude oil—all with a unified strategy: only long positions, no shorts.
His logic is very clear: having seen the top of crude oil, the bottom of silver and gold, his overall judgment is that the global trend remains accommodative, with massive cheap money ultimately pushing asset prices higher. Since the trend is upward, he follows the momentum and goes long; shorting is essentially fighting the trend and courting disaster. Once the macro fundamentals are set, he then focuses on detailed operations.
How does he do it specifically? He uses technical analysis combined with market volatility tools, reviewing all assets daily to find two types of opportunities: one is a bottoming signal, the other is a rebound after hitting a key support level. After identifying suitable targets, he sets the system to go long unilaterally, aggressively add positions, and split the capital evenly. He doesn’t set take-profit or stop-loss levels but only activates intelligent stop-loss.
Later, I learned this approach from him. Starting in April, I also followed this logic, but I chose a different method—I don’t fuss much over market ups and downs because ultimately, all opinions boil down to technical issues; there’s not much to say about it. Since then, my entire operation has become a standardized process—judging and executing trades mechanically every day. The previous situation of missing opportunities due to poor execution has gradually decreased significantly.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTongue
· 4h ago
This guy's execution is really terrible; it's pointless to be right... The real key is combining the system with the human brain.
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsTinfoilHat
· 4h ago
Execution is the key to success; analyzing data endlessly without taking action is just a decoration.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 4h ago
After all these years, execution is still the most critical...
Looking at the right things is useless; you have to actually make gains to win.
The combination of quantitative analysis + human judgment is truly unbeatable and reliable.
The system is designed to help us overcome human weaknesses—smart move.
Only going long and not short—that conviction is strong and must be backed by confidence.
Standardized processes, to put it simply, mean quitting the nitpicking and letting the hands follow the brain.
This feels like the correct approach...
View OriginalReply0
MetaMisery
· 5h ago
Damn, this is true execution power. There's a whole galaxy between knowing and doing.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapy
· 5h ago
It's the same old script of "finding opportunities is easy, execution is hard." I also have quite a few friends like this around me.
The truly profitable people never worry about right or wrong; they just do it and get it over with.
This guy's hybrid approach is quite clever—fundamentals plus systematic execution, finding a good balance.
But to be honest, I still feel a bit hesitant about strategies that don't set take-profit and stop-loss points.
Thinking of a friend I've collaborated with for over twenty years, this guy's background is quite interesting—dual expertise in finance and economics. His daily routine involves reading news, analyzing reports, and researching data. This habit, cultivated over decades, makes opportunities seem almost trivial to him. But because of this, one common flaw of his becomes especially noticeable: his execution ability is always just a bit off. Entering the market too early or too late, exiting at the wrong time—those opportunities that look huge often yield only modest returns, and he’s never experienced that thrill of catching a fish from start to finish.
The turning point began in February this year. He adopted a complete quantitative trading system, but the process was interesting—he didn’t just hand everything over to the system; he maintained a hybrid approach. First, relying on his professional experience and fundamental analysis to determine whether to go long or short on a certain asset, then he would set the conditions for the system to execute. Since then, he’s been comfortable trading indices, rebar, iron ore, gold, silver, and crude oil—all with a unified strategy: only long positions, no shorts.
His logic is very clear: having seen the top of crude oil, the bottom of silver and gold, his overall judgment is that the global trend remains accommodative, with massive cheap money ultimately pushing asset prices higher. Since the trend is upward, he follows the momentum and goes long; shorting is essentially fighting the trend and courting disaster. Once the macro fundamentals are set, he then focuses on detailed operations.
How does he do it specifically? He uses technical analysis combined with market volatility tools, reviewing all assets daily to find two types of opportunities: one is a bottoming signal, the other is a rebound after hitting a key support level. After identifying suitable targets, he sets the system to go long unilaterally, aggressively add positions, and split the capital evenly. He doesn’t set take-profit or stop-loss levels but only activates intelligent stop-loss.
Later, I learned this approach from him. Starting in April, I also followed this logic, but I chose a different method—I don’t fuss much over market ups and downs because ultimately, all opinions boil down to technical issues; there’s not much to say about it. Since then, my entire operation has become a standardized process—judging and executing trades mechanically every day. The previous situation of missing opportunities due to poor execution has gradually decreased significantly.