On-chain data speaks for itself. The recent funding game surrounding ASTER looks like a fierce battle among whales in deep waters.
Here's what happened — an address holder made a tough decision, selling off 18.48 million ENA tokens to net $5.71 million. The funds weren’t scattered around; they were all invested in one place: AsterDex, aggressively buying ASTER. Once the news broke, the community exploded.
But the real heartbreak came later. Another large holder with 68 million ASTER tokens hid in 15 wallets and endured nearly 8 hours of holding, but ultimately couldn’t hold on. They sold 4.68 million ASTER at $0.71 each, losing a total of $4.5 million. Even more painful, their initial purchase cost was $1.66, and now the entire position’s unrealized loss has exceeded $64 million.
Why split into 15 wallets? Simply put, there are two reasons: first, to avoid triggering platform risk controls; second, to prevent market attention. But such dispersal exposes a fundamental issue — liquidity.
ASTER’s daily trading volume usually doesn’t exceed $10 million. For a large holder like this, trying to exit smoothly? Nearly impossible. It’s like a fully loaded truck trying to brake on ice — it just can’t stop.
Even more interesting, after a whale made $420,000 profit from closing a long position in ASTER, they immediately switched to shorting. This shift from long to short hints at a subtle change in market sentiment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTears
· 10h ago
This liquidity is really deadly; 15 wallets can't save the big guy.
Another big whale getting trapped, but this time the players are pretty ruthless, shorting back.
ASTER is too small a market; whales can't move it at all, so they can only chop recklessly.
64 million in unrealized losses, directly leading to social death—this is the price of a reckless buy-in.
Long and short positions are flipping repeatedly; someone is harvesting emotions.
This is the real on-chain drama, more heartbreaking than a novel.
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancake
· 10h ago
The big account with a loss of 64 million is painful to watch. This liquidity is truly exceptional.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpander
· 10h ago
Wow, this ASTER is really a meat grinder. The unrealized loss of 64 million just makes me numb.
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressMiner
· 10h ago
15 wallets holding on for 8 hours still can't escape, this is the curse of small coins. The liquidity is so poor that even the smartest addresses dispersing is useless.
On-chain data speaks for itself. The recent funding game surrounding ASTER looks like a fierce battle among whales in deep waters.
Here's what happened — an address holder made a tough decision, selling off 18.48 million ENA tokens to net $5.71 million. The funds weren’t scattered around; they were all invested in one place: AsterDex, aggressively buying ASTER. Once the news broke, the community exploded.
But the real heartbreak came later. Another large holder with 68 million ASTER tokens hid in 15 wallets and endured nearly 8 hours of holding, but ultimately couldn’t hold on. They sold 4.68 million ASTER at $0.71 each, losing a total of $4.5 million. Even more painful, their initial purchase cost was $1.66, and now the entire position’s unrealized loss has exceeded $64 million.
Why split into 15 wallets? Simply put, there are two reasons: first, to avoid triggering platform risk controls; second, to prevent market attention. But such dispersal exposes a fundamental issue — liquidity.
ASTER’s daily trading volume usually doesn’t exceed $10 million. For a large holder like this, trying to exit smoothly? Nearly impossible. It’s like a fully loaded truck trying to brake on ice — it just can’t stop.
Even more interesting, after a whale made $420,000 profit from closing a long position in ASTER, they immediately switched to shorting. This shift from long to short hints at a subtle change in market sentiment.