A well-known trader's large position has once again changed. The ETH short position worth $106 million only held for 15 hours before declaring surrender and being forced to close out, resulting in a single-loss of $479,000. However, this trader offset losses in other directions — the long positions in BTC and SOL are currently in profit, and the overall loss in today's trading was kept at $49,000. From this case, it shows that large traders are quite decisive in executing stop-losses when facing rapid market reversals. It also reminds us that even whale-level traders with massive capital need to flexibly adjust their strategies during highly volatile market conditions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Anon32942
· 9h ago
Surrendered after just 15 hours, this wave of bears really couldn't hold on, but somehow I feel there's something not quite right?
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentTherapist
· 9h ago
15 hours to surrender, this whale isn't very impressive either
---
Cutting losses decisively is a good thing, but this loss amount is really nothing to us retail investors
---
Having a large amount of funds is an advantage; you can easily buy the dip and make a profit. As for us, we can only pray
---
ETH short positions were easily broken through, indicating that the market is really a bit fierce this time
---
It seems that even big players can't escape the market’s counterattack, huh
---
A $49,000 loss can still be called controlled; I can't learn this kind of mindset
---
Decisive stop-loss is correct, but the problem is you need to have that amount of funds first
---
Longs are still profitable, but shorts should be cautious
---
This trader’s portfolio configuration is interesting; they’re good at diversifying risk
---
I would be satisfied if I could have this level of position fluctuation too
View OriginalReply0
DAOplomacy
· 9h ago
honestly, the game theoretical implications here are... let's call it sub-optimal at best. dude got liquidated on eth in what, 15 hours? that's not "decisive risk management," that's just path dependency biting back tbh
Reply0
MissedAirdropAgain
· 9h ago
15 hours to give up, this ETH long is really fierce
---
479,000 loss, stopping out so quickly, no wonder it's a big player's mindset
---
I wonder what's going on with this whale, BTC and SOL have recovered? Diversifying risk and playing it smoothly
---
Damn, the short position only held for 15 hours, I, a small retail trader, would be lucky to hold for 15 days
---
Basically, I was caught bottom-fishing and got caught flying, decisively admitting loss is also a skill
---
That's why I'm always trapped, others can rely on longs to make up for losses, what about me?
---
Controlling losses at 49,000 is already quite an achievement, if it were me, I would have gone all-in and doubled the position
---
Sounds easy, but why is actual operation so difficult?
A well-known trader's large position has once again changed. The ETH short position worth $106 million only held for 15 hours before declaring surrender and being forced to close out, resulting in a single-loss of $479,000. However, this trader offset losses in other directions — the long positions in BTC and SOL are currently in profit, and the overall loss in today's trading was kept at $49,000. From this case, it shows that large traders are quite decisive in executing stop-losses when facing rapid market reversals. It also reminds us that even whale-level traders with massive capital need to flexibly adjust their strategies during highly volatile market conditions.