The trust difference between overseas projects and domestic projects has always been a hot topic in the Web3 community. Many believe that teams with different backgrounds have obvious differences in project authenticity. This reflects market participants' comprehensive judgment of factors such as project transparency, team background, regulatory environment, and more. To avoid pitfalls in this ecosystem, it's still necessary to do more research and gain a deep understanding of the project's actual operations, rather than simply relying on regional labels to make judgments.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HappyToBeDumped
· 3h ago
To be honest, the "region" tag should have been broken long ago, and there are quite a few overseas projects that have run away.
View OriginalReply0
MEVVictimAlliance
· 7h ago
Honestly, the issue of regional tags is really a false proposition. I've seen many large overseas projects collapse, and there are also reliable small teams domestically. The key still depends on technical details and the flow of funds. If you're too lazy to do your homework, don't blame being cut off.
View OriginalReply0
0xSunnyDay
· 7h ago
Honestly, regional tags are just a facade. I've seen how many major overseas projects directly rug... The key still depends on whether the team has actual output.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDay
· 7h ago
To put it bluntly, you can't just look at the region, you still have to look at the github of the project side, you still have to look at audit, don't wait for it to be cut before regretting it
View OriginalReply0
governance_ghost
· 7h ago
That's right, but the reality is that many people still rely on the "overseas" label to gamble, and end up getting cut again.
View OriginalReply0
FarmToRiches
· 7h ago
Overseas projects are not necessarily reliable, and domestic ones are not necessarily scams. The key is whether the team truly has substance.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 7h ago
Honestly, regional tags should have been discarded a long time ago; the key is whether the team is reliable or not.
The trust difference between overseas projects and domestic projects has always been a hot topic in the Web3 community. Many believe that teams with different backgrounds have obvious differences in project authenticity. This reflects market participants' comprehensive judgment of factors such as project transparency, team background, regulatory environment, and more. To avoid pitfalls in this ecosystem, it's still necessary to do more research and gain a deep understanding of the project's actual operations, rather than simply relying on regional labels to make judgments.