2025-12-30 07:00:24

#数字资产市场动态 From 1200U to 51,000U—My Three Ironclad Trading Rules

Let me share a real story. Starting with only 1200U, there’s no magic, no legendary leverage explosions—just steady growth to 51,000U, with zero liquidation throughout. Many ask if I got lucky; actually, no. Luck is unreliable. The only things that matter are rules and discipline.

**How to allocate funds? Three equal parts are the way to go**

Here's how I split the 1200U: three parts of 400U each. One for intraday trading to catch quick profits from short-term fluctuations; another for swing trading, waiting for a clear trend before acting; and the last one stays idle, keeping cash reserves. Basically, don’t put all your eggs in one basket. I never go all-in.

**When to trade? Wait for the big trend**

Most of the time in crypto, the market is sideways, and real opportunities are scarce. My approach is simple—during consolidation, I stay on the sidelines and stay patient. It may seem like a waste of time, but in reality, I’m waiting for a clear trend signal. Once it appears, that’s the real entry point. Many people trade frequently, but end up paying high fees and burning out. I don’t do that. The same logic applies to $SQD operations.

**How to protect yourself? Stop-loss + emotional control**

Set a stop-loss at 2%, and stick to it. When profits reach 4%, start reducing your position—don’t wait for it to skyrocket further. Easier said than done—because you’re battling your own greed. Rules are rules; emotions must take a back seat. Once you start guessing the market or trading on feelings, it’s over.

**Final words**

Having less capital isn’t a disadvantage; it actually forces you to learn risk management. Large accounts have higher tolerance for mistakes, small accounts must be precise. These three strategies—proper allocation, waiting for the trend, strict discipline—are the entire secret behind my growth from 1200U to 51,000U. No shortcuts, only execution.

SQD26,57%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseVagrant

· 3h ago

I've also tried this 2% stop loss, but I still keep getting cut repeatedly. Luck really plays a big role.

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 3h ago

I agree with splitting into thirds, but honestly, there are still too many people blowing up with full positions; they'll never learn. --- Waiting for the trend is tough. Most people just can't sit still, constantly trading themselves to death. --- A 2% stop loss sounds simple, but when you're really losing money, your hands tremble. Few can stick to the plan until the end. --- Having a small capital is actually an advantage. It forces you to be disciplined, while large accounts are more prone to reckless mistakes. --- The real way out is to avoid going all-in. I've seen too many people lose everything with a single reckless move. --- Waiting for the trend and sitting on the sidelines—either you're an expert or you're forced to stay on standby, but in the end, everyone survives. --- The hardest part is controlling emotions around stop losses. Don't even mention 2%; sometimes, I can't bring myself to cut at -5%. --- Turning 1,200 into 51,000 shows that the key is not having a gambling mentality. Many people could have reached that level.

View OriginalReply0

GraphGuru

· 3h ago

To be honest, I hadn't thought of the idea of dividing into three parts before, and it does feel quite stable. Trading fees really eat into profits; my previous frequent trades were mostly lost to fees. A 2% stop-loss sounds simple, but executing it requires restraint from greed. Small accounts definitely need to be more precise; there's no room for trial and error. Full positions are for crazy people; luckily, I'm not that reckless. When the trend is unclear, staying out of the market may seem like a waste of time, but actually, it's saving money. Emotional control is the real challenge; everyone understands the rules. This kind of exponential growth without leverage is indeed impressive; discipline really can make money. I also want to learn how to survive with a small account; I always get wiped out in swings. Talking about trends is easy, but actually doing it is hard; how steady must your mindset be?

View OriginalReply0

MissedAirdropAgain

· 3h ago

To be honest, I've been using the three-way split trick for a while, but my pace might be a bit more aggressive than yours. The key is to endure those sideways consolidation periods; that's the real test.

View OriginalReply0

DaoTherapy

· 3h ago

The tried-and-true method of dividing into three parts has indeed reduced the number of emotional outbursts. --- How are the people who are fully invested doing now? Just thinking about it makes me shudder. --- A 2% stop-loss is truly a life-and-death line. I've seen too many people break this rule and get wiped out. --- Having spare cash reserves is spot on; many people die because they run out of bullets. --- Frequent trading really is just working for the exchange. I realized this a bit late. --- Waiting for the trend is easy to say but very challenging; it tests human nature too much. --- Having less principal actually forces better risk control awareness. I hadn't thought of it from this perspective. --- The pain of paying fees out of profits is very real. Now I calculate everything carefully each time. --- Rules and discipline are the real moat; talent is secondary in comparison. --- These three seemingly simple rules are probably not widely executed by many people.

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 3h ago

The tripartite division set is indeed quite good, but to be honest, it really tests human nature.

View OriginalReply0

FancyResearchLab

· 3h ago

Haha, another story of "My Three Iron Laws." It sounds theoretically feasible. But on second thought, is the 2% stop-loss line really unshakable? It seems interesting, I need to try this smart trap.

View OriginalReply0