2025-12-30 07:29:41

The previously set stop-loss order was triggered, so we're taking a wait-and-see approach for now. The current trend hasn't shown the entry signals we need, so we're deciding to stay out of the market and wait. At this price level on the 15-minute chart, even if the MACD confirms a death cross, we won't consider shorting — because the decline is accompanied by volume release, indicating active selling pressure. What we need to do is be patient and wait for the price to dip further.

When does the real opportunity appear? It’s when the MACD forms a golden cross again and confirms a reversal, signaling the restart of the bullish trend. The key is to watch the position of the 15-minute moving average (MA) — if it acts as resistance above the price, we should gradually build positions in three stages; if the MA is below the price, we can enter all at once. Don’t forget to set stop-loss orders — risk management always comes first.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainDecoder

· 4h ago

From a technical perspective, this logic indeed has its merits—research shows that the MACD golden cross as a momentum confirmation signal performs relatively stably over short periods. However, it is worth noting that relying solely on this indicator still presents a significant sample bias issue. It is recommended to refer to the relevant chapters in "Technical Analysis from Beginner to Expert." The decision to stay out of the market and observe itself is not problematic, but I am more concerned—does the release of trading volume necessarily mean active dumping? Is there a risk of over-logic inference here? Building positions at three different levels versus entering all at once—how big is the actual risk-reward difference between these two approaches? Data indicates that 70% of retail investors in the market actually cannot strictly follow a phased strategy; psychological account effects often interfere with decision-making. I agree that "Stop-loss always comes first," but how exactly should it be set? Points or percentage? It feels like a quantitative standard is missing here.

View OriginalReply0

Ser_Liquidated

· 5h ago

Stop-loss was hit and now it's back, now I can sit back and watch the show Scared to buy after being dumped on, wait for the golden cross to give me another chance Holding no position is the best position, anyway I don't have much to lose now MA is crucial, with resistance above and support below, feels like nothing was said at all Gradually buying or going all-in at once? I choose to do nothing, it feels comfortable

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeGazer

· 5h ago

Once the stop-loss is hit, I know I have to pay the tuition today. Now, staying flat with no positions is the most comfortable. It's the same old story of waiting for the MACD golden cross. Can we avoid repeating the same cycle this time? Splitting the position into three batches sounds easy, but in practice, my hands start to tremble.

View OriginalReply0

NFTArtisanHQ

· 5h ago

ngl the patience play here kinda reminds me of benjamin's concept of the aura in mechanical reproduction... except we're waiting for the market's authentic moment to re-emerge, you know? the macd as a kind of proof-of-intent system, fascinating

Reply0