2025-12-30 08:27:02

Projects in the RWA track have indeed been diverse over the years, with most simply wrapping traditional assets in a blockchain shell. The concepts are glamorous, but implementation is difficult. How does the cash flow come from? Vague explanations. It wasn't until I encountered projects like $SAIL.r that I understood what real substance is — it doesn't rely on castles in the air, but rather on profits generated through genuine commercial activities that are directly reflected to on-chain holders. This is what RWA should look like. Not promises, but traceable business logic; not expectations, but value distribution achieved simultaneously with product sales. What seems like complex asset tokenization can actually be straightforward and effective.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ShamedApeSeller

· 6h ago

Enlightening, RWA is indeed 99% scammers telling stories.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightTrader

· 6h ago

The narrative of manipulating cash flow has been overused, and finally someone has put real effort into it.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 6h ago

That's right, most RWA projects are indeed just a different flavor of the same old story. Where's the cash flow? Only projects backed by real business logic are worth paying attention to; otherwise, it's just another story of a failed launch. Finally, someone has spoken out. Now, everywhere you look, there are shell projects... Trustworthy RWA projects are few and far between, and even fewer can actually generate returns. Most are just leek fields. Traceable business logic > just making big promises, this understanding is spot on.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 6h ago

Finally someone hit the nail on the head. Most RWA projects are just scammers making empty promises. $SAIL.r is the kind of project I want to see. --- Real cash flow > sweet talk. This is what blockchain should look like. --- Wait, can $SAIL.r really track commercial activities? Or are they just changing the story to fool us again? --- Only now do I realize that RWA can be so straightforward. The previous projects were really just playing word games. --- Actual profit distribution vs false promises. The choice is obvious. --- How many times have I been scammed by RWA projects? Seeing something like $SAIL.r makes me a bit skeptical. --- So the key is whether it can truly track cash flow; otherwise, it's just superficial. --- The RWA track finally has some meaning. It's not all just hype and empty talk.

View OriginalReply0

FadCatcher

· 6h ago

There are too many concept sales, and very few that can truly generate cash flow. SAIL.r is probably the right path. --- In the past two years, I haven't seen many RWA projects that actually land; most are just talk on paper. SAIL.r has made a good start. --- Finally, someone has spoken out. Those RWA projects are just putting on a blockchain disguise; they don't have much substance. Direct profit sharing like SAIL.r is more reliable. --- Traceable business logic is very important; it's much better than empty promises. --- Real revenue feedback—that's what I want to see RWA projects look like. --- Actually, many RWA projects can't answer questions about cash flow. SAIL.r at least has real business support. --- Not every project labeled with blockchain is worth paying attention to; it depends on whether there's real money behind it.

View OriginalReply0