Speaking of the returns from the Lighter project, those who got in early indeed enjoyed significant gains. The first batch of participants generally saw returns of over 10x, which is already quite good compared to current projects. However, the costs for accounts added later increased significantly, mainly due to stricter witch protection measures. To be honest, I haven't fully understood their logic for witch detection—some say accounts from the same IP are considered witches, while others say quickly opening and closing accounts makes them easier to identify. In the end, the returns for later entrants were mostly between 2 to 3x, which significantly reduced the overall profit.
This actually illustrates a key principle: the timing of participation in a project is really crucial. During the peak hype, opportunities seem abundant, but in reality, the costs are driven up, and the profit margins are squeezed. The difference between early and late entry is quite substantial.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropCollector
· 7h ago
10x to 2x, this gap is indeed outrageous
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpa
· 7h ago
ngl the 10x early vs 2-3x later pipeline is just classic ponzinomics playing out in real time. their sybil detection probably works exactly as intended — keep the early birds fat, squeeze the latecomers. nothing new under the sun really.
Reply0
GateUser-5854de8b
· 7h ago
10x and 2x, a single character difference makes all the difference between heaven and earth.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 7h ago
It's the same timing theory again. I bet five dollars, and everyone who entered afterward is now regretting it.
Speaking of the returns from the Lighter project, those who got in early indeed enjoyed significant gains. The first batch of participants generally saw returns of over 10x, which is already quite good compared to current projects. However, the costs for accounts added later increased significantly, mainly due to stricter witch protection measures. To be honest, I haven't fully understood their logic for witch detection—some say accounts from the same IP are considered witches, while others say quickly opening and closing accounts makes them easier to identify. In the end, the returns for later entrants were mostly between 2 to 3x, which significantly reduced the overall profit.
This actually illustrates a key principle: the timing of participation in a project is really crucial. During the peak hype, opportunities seem abundant, but in reality, the costs are driven up, and the profit margins are squeezed. The difference between early and late entry is quite substantial.