Here's something to consider about creator coins as they're structured right now: they're basically memecoins with misaligned incentives. Think about the actual setup. Creators typically grab their money upfront through fees—that's locked in day one. The token? It's not really their game-changer. The real money flows in later, after launch, when brand partnerships and sponsorship deals kick in. So the token holders are taking on the speculation risk while creators have already cashed out from the infrastructure. The economic incentives just don't line up. Creators benefit from hype and early adoption to secure those lucrative deals, but they're not actually tied to long-term token performance. It's a structure where the token becomes secondary to traditional monetization—which raises questions about whether these really function as true utility tokens or just another layer of speculative markets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-c799715c
· 7h ago
Basically, creator coins are just a new way to scam retail investors.
Creators have long cashed out, retail investors are left holding the bag. This trick has been played out for years.
Token holders suffer huge losses, while creators have already counted their money. It's really .
It seems like all creator coins now follow this pattern, with no real practical value.
Partners sign contracts and then run, while token bagholders are still dreaming.
This structure is ridiculous, no wonder no one trusts creator coins anymore.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 7h ago
In simple terms, the creator's tricks to cut the leeks have changed, and token holders are just the bagholders.
---
The creator gets the money on the first day, while retail investors are still trading? Who can stand that?
---
So this thing is just pyramid selling disguised as Web3. Am I right?
---
The real money is in brand collaborations; tokens are just a gimmick, hard to sustain.
---
The unequal incentives should have been pointed out long ago, and now someone finally dares to speak up.
---
Want to make money? Follow early collaborations with creators and buy their tokens? Haha.
---
Another so-called "innovation" is just old wine in a new bottle; creators have already made a fortune.
Here's something to consider about creator coins as they're structured right now: they're basically memecoins with misaligned incentives. Think about the actual setup. Creators typically grab their money upfront through fees—that's locked in day one. The token? It's not really their game-changer. The real money flows in later, after launch, when brand partnerships and sponsorship deals kick in. So the token holders are taking on the speculation risk while creators have already cashed out from the infrastructure. The economic incentives just don't line up. Creators benefit from hype and early adoption to secure those lucrative deals, but they're not actually tied to long-term token performance. It's a structure where the token becomes secondary to traditional monetization—which raises questions about whether these really function as true utility tokens or just another layer of speculative markets.