An address that has only had a single transaction received a 200 LIT airdrop. It seems that this address is indeed easily flagged as a witch account, but in reality, the Lighter project's anti-witch mechanism doesn't seem as strict as imagined. Thinking about it—during that period, the threshold for score boosting was indeed low, and frankly, early adopters still gained quite a bit of advantage. This also highlights a point: during the distribution phase of new projects, participating promptly makes it easier to obtain benefits than latercomers, especially when risk control is still in the exploration stage.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatcher
· 7h ago
Ha, this protection mechanism is really just like that. Early birds indeed caught the worm.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 7h ago
This witch's protection is useless... Early on, it was really a paradise for exploiting loopholes.
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTrader
· 7h ago
Wow, this witch detection is too lenient. You can get 200 with a single transaction? Early players are really just winning by default.
View OriginalReply0
Blockwatcher9000
· 7h ago
The witch bug is so obvious. Lighter's risk control this time is indeed a bit lax, early birds definitely profit from it.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 7h ago
A single transaction of 200 LIT? This protection mechanism is indeed quite loose... Early adopters still managed to profit.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetFreeloader
· 7h ago
Ha, this witch's protection mechanism is really weak. You can even farm 200 LIT with a single transaction?
Early participation is the way to go; later participants will just get screwed.
Getting in before the risk control is fully figured out is really a huge profit.
Lighter's recent protection measures are indeed a bit weak, not as strict as during our testnet phase.
So, I tell you, new projects should be jumped on early, or you'll just end up holding the bag.
An address that has only had a single transaction received a 200 LIT airdrop. It seems that this address is indeed easily flagged as a witch account, but in reality, the Lighter project's anti-witch mechanism doesn't seem as strict as imagined. Thinking about it—during that period, the threshold for score boosting was indeed low, and frankly, early adopters still gained quite a bit of advantage. This also highlights a point: during the distribution phase of new projects, participating promptly makes it easier to obtain benefits than latercomers, especially when risk control is still in the exploration stage.