2025-12-30 09:29:06

If Backpack had a bit more determination in decision-making, it wouldn't have ended up like this today. Look at how others operate, and then look at yourself—there's really no comparison.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BridgeJumper

· 15h ago

Rather than saying the decision isn't ruthless enough, it's better to say the direction wasn't thought through clearly.

View OriginalReply0

ETHReserveBank

· 15h ago

Seeing through it, Backpack's recent move was too cautious. Not taking action when it's time to act—that's the difference.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_failure

· 15h ago

Really, Backpack's decision-making this time was a complete failure. But to be honest, there are many projects like this in Web3, and their slow decision-making kills progress.

View OriginalReply0

DAOTruant

· 15h ago

Weak project teams always end up suffering losses. Backpack's performance this time was indeed disappointing.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCry

· 15h ago

Damn, Backpack's decision-making is really disappointing. Missing out on so many opportunities and still dragging along slowly.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullAlarm

· 15h ago

On-chain data clearly shows that the concentration of funds in Backpack's treasury address should have already sounded the alarm, yet it continues to drag on... This is a typical case of decision paralysis.

View OriginalReply0

ChainBrain