#战略性加仓BTC ⚡ Upgraded: The power struggle between the U.S. epicenter and the central bank, from rhetoric to legal battles

$BTC $ETH $BNB

The latest development is—Trump's attitude towards Powell has shifted from "replacing" to "prosecuting," with charges involving "gross dereliction of duty" and "financial audit loopholes." This is no longer just a policy disagreement; it has evolved into a challenge to the independence of the central bank itself.

⚔️ Deep dimensions of the conflict:

1️⃣ Power Play: Trump's camp is pushing for their preferred central bank leaders (Hasset or Wosh), aiming to reshape the rules of the global liquidity game.

2️⃣ Institutional Test: If the Federal Reserve succumbs to political pressure, the core support of the fiat currency system—the policy independence—will face substantial damage.

3️⃣ Asset Logic Reassessment: Once "central bank under political interference" shifts from an assumption to reality, all asset valuation systems relying on traditional financial stability assumptions will need recalibration.

🌊 What happens when the trust in the old order begins to crack?

Capital flows are always very pragmatic—they seek more stable, less manipulable consensus foundations. The greater the policy uncertainty, the more attractive are assets that resist censorship mechanisms and are truly distributed, cross-sovereign consensus assets. This is the market signal quietly being released by the macro environment.

👇 What’s your view on this ultimate showdown?

A. Powell retreats → Rapid shift in monetary policy → Nominal preservation of central bank independence, but de facto disintegration

B. Legal tug-of-war → Short-term policy confusion → Markets endure long-term volatility and uncertainty

C. Consensus upgrade → Traditional finance credit sinks → Funds accelerate into non-politicized asset sectors

Leave your choice below, or share your reasoning.