Bitcoin faces a critical inflection point this year. If BTC closes out 2025 below $96,900, it would be the first time in history that a post-halving cycle ends in the red. What makes this particularly interesting? Breaking the traditional 4-year halving cycle might actually be the most constructive signal we've seen. Sometimes the market needs to rewrite its own playbook.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
4am_degen
· 11h ago
NGL, a destructive cycle might actually be a good thing? That logic is a bit extreme.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoCrazyGF
· 11h ago
Breaking the cycle = the strongest signal? I love this logic, it shows the market is evolving.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 11h ago
Breaking the deadlock is breaking the deadlock. Instead of sticking to old routines, it's better to let the market speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketBuilder
· 11h ago
Is disrupting the traditional cycle a good thing? I don't think so; let's focus on staying alive first.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSurfer
· 11h ago
Breaking the cycle might really be a good thing, but the prerequisite is to make it to that day.
Bitcoin faces a critical inflection point this year. If BTC closes out 2025 below $96,900, it would be the first time in history that a post-halving cycle ends in the red. What makes this particularly interesting? Breaking the traditional 4-year halving cycle might actually be the most constructive signal we've seen. Sometimes the market needs to rewrite its own playbook.