The IPO market in 2025 has just heard the "warming" signal, but it has quickly delivered a harsh wake-up call to 21 newly minted billionaires—these founders whose net worth skyrocketed past $1 billion on their first day of listing have seen their wealth evaporate by 23% in the blink of an eye. What is really behind this phenomenon of "overnight wealth and rapid reversal"?
According to the latest data from Bloomberg, the 21 new billionaires who became wealthy through IPOs this year enjoyed a glamorous debut, with their net worth all crossing the $1 billion mark, and media outlets flooding the headlines with tales of "wealth creation myths." But reality is quite brutal—within just a few weeks or even months, these paper fortunes have experienced a rollercoaster ride, with an average decline of 23%. The dream of "one-day billionaire" has faded rather quickly.
As someone who has long observed the capital markets, I want to say: this is not a coincidence at all, but a replay of the old trick of "primary market frenzy and secondary market dumping." Even more glaring is that this phenomenon is almost a twin brother to the crypto scene's "projects reaching peak upon launch."
In essence, whether it’s an IPO or a token listing, early valuations of new assets are inevitably inflated. On the IPO side, it’s the underwriters’ premium packaging; on the crypto side, it’s the valuation overreach after private funding rounds. Both are essentially about front-running future growth potential and turning it into today’s price. Once market sentiment shifts, and without solid fundamentals and real use cases to support, valuations can only be corrected downward—from bubble peaks to more rational levels. This process is often swift and brutal.
The key to avoiding pitfalls is not to be fooled by the hype on the first day. Truly valuable assets should be judged by their underlying business logic and long-term growth potential, not by short-term market heat.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoonBoi42
· 8h ago
The paper millionaire dream is gone with 23%, this old script of cutting leeks is indeed extremely outdated. These two brothers, Level 1 and Level 2, just know how to con people together.
View OriginalReply0
FreeRider
· 8h ago
Paper billionaires are all for nothing, still the same old tricks.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 8h ago
Paper wealth is really like a roller coaster, with the first day reaching a billion and then dropping 23% in a few weeks. This routine has been played out in the crypto circle for a long time.
---
It's the old trick of "investment bank premiums + market absorption," which can confuse anyone.
---
So ultimately, the bottom line is—don't trust the excitement on the first day; looking at the fundamentals is the real key.
---
Haha, IPOs and crypto project launches are really identical; early valuations are all inflated.
---
These people have truly experienced the taste of "paper millionaires," only to turn around and face reality.
---
The key question is how many people are still chasing the hot trend; it's really hard to learn.
---
In simple terms, the gap between the bubble peak and rational price is often both quick and fierce.
View OriginalReply0
PumpStrategist
· 8h ago
This is a typical high-level pump and dump, with the distribution of chips showing that institutions have already exited [laugh].
The same routine as the crypto new highs, the pattern is already clear, it was obvious from the start.
The term "paper wealth" is used well; frankly, it's just a bubble.
Those who go all-in based on the first day's gains are exhibiting leek mentality.
A 23% pullback is actually quite mild; I've seen projects drop to zero directly.
The key still lies in trading volume and genuine business growth, not just concepts.
Overhyped valuations in the primary market inevitably put pressure on the secondary market; this probabilistic strategy is too obvious.
You could see this problem coming three months ago, but unfortunately most people only look at that single candlestick on the K-line.
I can't understand why people chase the first-day limit-up; when market sentiment indicators go off the charts, it's even more reason to run.
In a month, when we look at the wealth rankings of these 21 people, the interesting points will become very clear.
The IPO market in 2025 has just heard the "warming" signal, but it has quickly delivered a harsh wake-up call to 21 newly minted billionaires—these founders whose net worth skyrocketed past $1 billion on their first day of listing have seen their wealth evaporate by 23% in the blink of an eye. What is really behind this phenomenon of "overnight wealth and rapid reversal"?
According to the latest data from Bloomberg, the 21 new billionaires who became wealthy through IPOs this year enjoyed a glamorous debut, with their net worth all crossing the $1 billion mark, and media outlets flooding the headlines with tales of "wealth creation myths." But reality is quite brutal—within just a few weeks or even months, these paper fortunes have experienced a rollercoaster ride, with an average decline of 23%. The dream of "one-day billionaire" has faded rather quickly.
As someone who has long observed the capital markets, I want to say: this is not a coincidence at all, but a replay of the old trick of "primary market frenzy and secondary market dumping." Even more glaring is that this phenomenon is almost a twin brother to the crypto scene's "projects reaching peak upon launch."
In essence, whether it’s an IPO or a token listing, early valuations of new assets are inevitably inflated. On the IPO side, it’s the underwriters’ premium packaging; on the crypto side, it’s the valuation overreach after private funding rounds. Both are essentially about front-running future growth potential and turning it into today’s price. Once market sentiment shifts, and without solid fundamentals and real use cases to support, valuations can only be corrected downward—from bubble peaks to more rational levels. This process is often swift and brutal.
The key to avoiding pitfalls is not to be fooled by the hype on the first day. Truly valuable assets should be judged by their underlying business logic and long-term growth potential, not by short-term market heat.