There is a classic problem in the carbon market—double spending. After a wind power plant generates 1000 kWh of electricity, it not only sells the electricity to the grid for profit but also packages and sells the "green attribute" certificates of those 1000 kWh to Apple. Even more outrageous, because databases across regions are not interconnected, the same certificate is sold to Google. A single green power certificate is counted multiple times, severely distorting the authenticity of carbon offsetting.



To fundamentally eliminate this issue, reforms must start at the source. One approach is to deploy nodes directly on the SCADA system of wind turbines. For each 1 MWh generated, a Dynamic NFT is automatically created, recording complete metadata such as Source(Wind Turbine ID), Time(Timestamp), Amount(Electricity), Grid_Hash(On-chain Hash), etc. This NFT is unique and cannot be duplicated.

The real protection lies at the user end. To offset carbon emissions, Apple must actively destroy the (Burn) NFT on-chain. The destruction record is permanently publicly accessible. If Google attempts to purchase the same NFT, the blockchain immediately shows Status: Burned—destroyed, and the transaction cannot continue. The dual locking at the physical and cryptographic levels makes secondary sales completely invalid.

Once this logic matures, carbon credits can be standardized as ERC-20 or ERC-721 assets, truly enabling transparent global carbon liquidity trading.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTHoardervip
· 10h ago
Deploy directly at the SCADA level? That's the real way to get stuck from the source. Finally, someone understands.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologistvip
· 10h ago
Isn't this just giving the rat poison of the carbon market to NFTs? Honestly, it's still a trust issue.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMongervip
· 10h ago
nft-based carbon credits sound clean on paper but lol the real attack vector is still the oracle layer... who's verifying those SCADA timestamps aren't getting manipulated upstream? classic case of solving the blockchain problem while ignoring the meatspace vulnerability.
Reply0
WalletWhisperervip
· 10h ago
nft burn mechanics hitting different when the stakes are actually environmental, not just jpeg floor prices. the double-spend vector here feels almost too obvious in hindsight—like watching address clustering patterns repeat themselves before the cascade. source traceability at the scada layer though? that's where the pattern recognition gets interesting. every transaction leaves fingerprints.
Reply0
CompoundPersonalityvip
· 10h ago
It turns out that the carbon market can also be double-spent. I didn't expect Apple and Google to team up for this wave of wool pulling.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 10h ago
Amazing, finally someone has put the mess of the carbon market on the blockchain.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)