On-chain smart contracts are like super brains trapped inside a transparent glass house—logic is impeccable, execution is precise and flawless, but once it involves the real world outside the chain, it becomes completely blind. It can read every byte on the blockchain but knows nothing about what happens in the real world. This information silo ensures security but also becomes the most stubborn problem in the DeFi ecosystem. Oracles are supposed to solve this contradiction, but unfortunately, most solutions only open a small crack.



How deadly is the single point of failure in traditional oracles? Imagine a DeFi protocol that can only obtain ETH prices from a few mainstream exchanges—it's like sensing the entire world with just one arm. If this "tentacle" gets stuck (data source manipulated, server crashes, or attacked), the entire system falls into trouble. The 2022 oracle storm is a vivid example—attackers exploited these vulnerabilities to siphon off hundreds of millions of dollars.

Even more embarrassing is that real-world data types are far more complex than simple price quotes. The final outcome of a football match, whether rainfall in a region meets insurance requirements, whether goods arrive at the port on time... These unstructured, multi-dimensional pieces of information are simply beyond the reach of traditional oracles. They are too fragile, too vulnerable, and too easily manipulated.

APRO's approach is different—rather than relying on a single tentacle to muddle through, it extends multiple tentacles like an octopus to sense simultaneously. Multi-source data aggregation, multi-modal information processing, distributed verification mechanisms... this combination is the only way to truly break down the information barrier between smart contracts and the outside world.
ETH0,93%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DaoResearchervip
· 8h ago
According to the white paper, the single point failure rate of traditional oracles under extreme market conditions is actually far beyond most people's understanding. The on-chain data from the 2022 crash event is enough to illustrate the problem. Multi-source aggregation sounds good, but how can the incentive mechanism ensure that nodes do not collude? This is the real deadlock in game theory. The oracle problem is essentially one of information asymmetry. Can APRO's distributed verification truly solve the incentive incompatibility? I remain skeptical. Introducing off-chain data into smart contracts, the risk traceability chain is too long—who will be responsible? The governance mechanism must be clarified. No matter how many tentacles Octopus has, it ultimately comes back to token economics—where does the motivation for decentralized node participation come from? The failure of price oracles was indeed disastrous, but can the cost of verifying unstructured data really be borne? It's worth noting the economic aspect. Multimodal processing sounds advanced, but how scalable is it in practice? I haven't seen a complete on-chain implementation plan.
View OriginalReply0
SneakyFlashloanvip
· 8h ago
The octopus tentacle metaphor is brilliant; traditional oracles are indeed just an arm poking the world.
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notablevip
· 8h ago
The analogy of the glass house is brilliant, but to be honest, no one has truly mastered the oracle aspect yet; everyone is still exploring. Single point risk is indeed a nightmare; the bloodshed in 2022 is still vivid in memory... Most projects are still using band-aid solutions. The multi-tentacle approach of APRO sounds good, but it depends on how it is actually implemented—don't let it become just a PPT project again. I agree with multi-source aggregation, but who will guarantee the game theory issues of the distributed validation mechanism? It still feels like we need to wait for the market to truly validate it; too many oracle solutions have ultimately been abandoned.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidatorvip
· 8h ago
It's the old story of oracles, but it really hits home... Single point risk should have been taken seriously long ago. I think the key is to have multiple sources of verification; otherwise, no matter how fancy the solution, it's just a paper tiger. It's outrageous that in 2022, a few hundred million could be stolen; how many projects are truly well-protected now?
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leakervip
· 9h ago
The storm of oracles I never managed to outrun, and I'm still gathering dust. The analogy of perceiving the world with one arm is perfect; DeFi is just like that. APRO multi-source aggregation sounds good, but I don't know if it's reliable. The amount of money cut during the 2022 leek-cutting wave just by looking at it, I was emotionally affected. Multimodal information processing? Feels like another marketing buzzword. The real issue is that no matter how much centralized oracles are beautified, the essence cannot be changed. Octopus tentacle analogy works, but in the end, it's still about who to trust. Feels like another hype, but the actual protocols in use are not that many.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhilosophervip
· 9h ago
A tentacle sensing the world, no wonder in 2022 that wave directly cut off several billion.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)