There's a trick I've figured out a long time ago—first release the trading signals, then follow up with the actual technical analysis. This way, the community can see the entire process. It sounds simple, but here's the problem: when you actually publish data-driven technical analysis, many people tend to dismiss it as FUD. Ironically, with the same content, just changing the order of publication can lead to vastly different reactions. This is the interesting aspect of market psychology—people tend to trust visible trading results more than the underlying analytical logic.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PumpBeforeRugvip
· 11h ago
That's the trick, and it ends up causing people to see analysis as FUD. Human nature is just that realistic.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperervip
· 11h ago
Results are king; analysis is all nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
HashBrowniesvip
· 11h ago
Hmm, this strategy is indeed brilliant. Ultimately, results matter. No matter how good the analysis is, people only look at the rise and fall.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSeller69vip
· 11h ago
Results are king; all analyses are armchair strategizing afterward.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 11h ago
Amazing, this is why placing orders is more popular than writing analyses; results are king.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistantvip
· 11h ago
Results are king, analysis is just a complement... This is the reality of the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)