Cryptocurrency projects are often built on vague and lofty concepts, but from a physics perspective, the TRON network and sTRX become much clearer.
Network operation requires computational energy. This is a hard requirement. What sTRX does is commodify this need—when you stake tokens, you are essentially renting energy capacity to developers and users, and the return is the rent. Thinking about it from this perspective makes it much more comfortable.
This is not a gambling-style hype chase, but an investment in a real resource market. As long as someone builds applications or initiates transactions on TRON, energy will be continuously consumed. sTRX earns its livelihood this way. The more applications in the ecosystem, the more frequent the transactions, the greater the energy demand, and the more stable the returns.
The key is that this logic is self-consistent. You are not expecting the price to skyrocket, but participating in a sustainable system based on the fundamental principles of blockchain. Every transaction fee and resource call directly reflects the genuine market demand. Compared to projects that rely on storytelling, this infrastructure-based revenue model is more convincing.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProtocolRebel
· 9h ago
Wow, someone finally explained this clearly. The perspective of energy leasing is brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
LazyDevMiner
· 9h ago
Finally, someone has clarified that energy is a hard requirement, not just a virtual concept.
Speaking of which, the TRON ecosystem needs to be more active; otherwise, the demand for energy will be hard to increase.
This logic is indeed self-consistent and much more reliable than those boastful projects.
sTRX's biggest fear is that TRON will be unused, and when that happens, excess energy will be the end of it.
The infrastructure revenue model does sound more appealing than storytelling, but it comes with many prerequisites.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 9h ago
Haha, this perspective is indeed fresh. Finally, someone has explained the energy thing clearly.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeTherapist
· 9h ago
This logic is indeed much stronger than storytelling; the energy leasing system is about eating from the ecosystem's bowl.
Cryptocurrency projects are often built on vague and lofty concepts, but from a physics perspective, the TRON network and sTRX become much clearer.
Network operation requires computational energy. This is a hard requirement. What sTRX does is commodify this need—when you stake tokens, you are essentially renting energy capacity to developers and users, and the return is the rent. Thinking about it from this perspective makes it much more comfortable.
This is not a gambling-style hype chase, but an investment in a real resource market. As long as someone builds applications or initiates transactions on TRON, energy will be continuously consumed. sTRX earns its livelihood this way. The more applications in the ecosystem, the more frequent the transactions, the greater the energy demand, and the more stable the returns.
The key is that this logic is self-consistent. You are not expecting the price to skyrocket, but participating in a sustainable system based on the fundamental principles of blockchain. Every transaction fee and resource call directly reflects the genuine market demand. Compared to projects that rely on storytelling, this infrastructure-based revenue model is more convincing.