2025-12-30 23:29:48

Many people have a skewed understanding of LTC, mainly because they are using the wrong evaluation standards.

Startups focus on growth, while systems focus on stability. These are two completely different logics.

Litecoin has not conducted token buybacks in over ten years, has not hyped new concepts, has not performed emergency forks to save the project, and has not been creating new stories every year to attract attention. Just in this regard, many issues are already evident. Some projects frequently "innovate," but in reality, they are proving their fragility. LTC's ability to remain low-key amidst market volatility is actually a sign of strength.

When you measure system-level projects with the standards of a "startup," you definitely won't see their value. They are two different things.

LTC0,12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasBandit

· 7h ago

Exactly right, LTC is the kind of honest person who quietly does its work, neither showing off nor causing trouble. Really, a bunch of projects are always thinking about how to scam money and harvest profits, while LTC is living quite steadily. That’s true strength. People always want to see flashy things, but after being exploited, they still don’t understand what happened. Over the past ten years, LTC has been proving that stable operation itself is the best story. Many people really can’t tell the difference between what is system-level and what is a financing scheme.

View OriginalReply0

FloorSweeper

· 7h ago

lol finally someone said it. most people are just pattern matching on hype cycles, they don't understand the difference between a system and a casino token. ltc's boring consistency is literally the whole point... but nah, paper hands need daily drama to feel smart about their bags

Reply0

ChainComedian

· 7h ago

Basically, it means no one respects old stuff, and only new tricks are considered promising. This logic is indeed absurd... Stable operation for ten years still gets criticized, while constantly revamping is praised to the skies.

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 8h ago

This is the principle I realized after losing a lot back then: stability overrides everything. --- Exactly right, flashy projects each have their storytelling skills, but in the end, they all become tears of the leek. --- System-level projects should be like this; don’t always think about stirring up trouble. Being low-key is the way to go. --- Bro, your words really hit home for me. In a bear market, you should sleep soundly hugging these old antiques. --- After seeing so many projects run away, I now only believe in things like LTC that are "boring." --- Ten years without changing, this thing is much more reliable than those who keep raising funds and telling new stories every day. --- Finally, someone clarified: it’s not that LTC has no growth, it’s that you used the wrong yardstick. --- Those projects that frequently "innovate" are basically just acting; LTC is really doing the work. --- Last year, I didn’t even consider LTC, now I realize I was totally clueless. --- Stability is what retail investors look down on the most, but institutions value it the most. Understand?

View OriginalReply0