2025-12-31 00:20:30

The recent collective anxiety in the crypto world has been a bit exaggerated. Tweets being deleted, large sell-offs, doomsday theories in communities... Various signals are mixed together, and many people are starting to fill their minds with the terrifying script of a "repeat of the subprime crisis." I even have a friend who is considering withdrawing all their retirement funds.

But upon冷静 reflection, the panic in this wave of public opinion has been blown out of proportion. As a market observer who has experienced the 2017 ICO bubble, the 2020 312 plunge, and the 2021 519 waterfall, I want to use three actual signals to debunk this "collective panic" routine.

**First Signal: The leverage structure is completely different**
The 2008 financial crisis was fundamentally about a "break in the debt chain"—subprime mortgages were packaged into financial derivatives, creating a complex web of credit and debt among banks, investment institutions, and households. Once housing prices fell, the entire chain would avalanche. Now, although there is leverage trading in the crypto space, these are choices made by market participants themselves, unlike in 2008 when systemic financial institutions transmitted risk to the entire economy. Retail traders' actions and systemic risk are two different things.

**Second Signal: The logic of institutional behavior is different**
In 2008, institutions were forced into panic-selling to maintain liquidity and risk control. Now, leading institutions entering the crypto market can hedge against any volatility using various tools—futures, spot, derivatives combinations. Their sell-offs are more about proactive risk adjustment rather than passive survival pressure.

**Third Signal: The underlying market logic is different**
The housing market in 2008 lacked transparency, with severe information asymmetry. The on-chain data in crypto is fully transparent; large transfers, liquidation pressures, and wallet distributions can be seen in real-time. Panic can only last so long because real information will surface quickly.

So don’t be swayed by emotions. Check your risk tolerance, operate accordingly, and don’t be scared into shutting down the app by "history repeating" theories.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PositionPhobia

· 8h ago

Starting to compare again to 2008. It's always the same approach. Forget it, I'll stick with my BTC holdings.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedTwice

· 8h ago

Are you really going to withdraw all your retirement funds? Bro, you're heading for bankruptcy... I was also involved in the 312 wave, and it was much scarier than this. But what happened? This is just a carnival of public opinion manufacturing, a mere information gap. Leverage liquidation ≠ system collapse, those who confuse the two haven't experienced it. Everything on the chain is transparent, so what are you afraid of? Just look at the data. Here comes the "history repeating itself" routine again, I'm exhausted... Subprime loans? Our markets are not the same, okay? With so many hedging tools in the hands of institutions, it’s unlikely. The real risk lies in the leverage you add yourself, 😂 times. I think this argument makes some sense, but don’t get too optimistic either. Emotional contagion is just like this, it’s hard to eliminate. It's just short-term panic; if you endure it, it will be the same as before.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 8h ago

To be honest, I also didn't buy the dip at 312 and 519, and I'm still regretting it haha Is it the repeated phrase "History will inevitably repeat itself"? I think it's a collective over-interpretation of the script Don't confuse leverage auto-explosion with systemic risk; the author explained this thoroughly Your friend wants to withdraw pension funds? Advise him to finish reading this article first Blockchain transparency is indeed a moat, but transparent information can't prevent irrational selling either Top institutions have strong hedging capabilities, but retail investors? Haha, they're still easily harvested

View OriginalReply0

TradingNightmare

· 8h ago

Starting to bring up 2008 again, I've heard this argument too many times. My friend went all-in after hearing your words, and he's still losing money. On-chain transparency can save lives? Then why did so many people get liquidated during 312?

View OriginalReply0

0xSleepDeprived

· 8h ago

Here comes another "Don't panic" logic... But to be fair, the leverage structure part is indeed correctly explained. Friends who dare to move their retirement funds, we really should smash their phones. On-chain transparency is definitely an advantage in the crypto world, much better than the institutions in 2007 that couldn't even keep track of their own holdings. The theory that history repeats itself is nonsense. If it were a second subprime crisis (Subprime 2.0), it would have already exploded long ago. Why wait until now? 312, 519 are back alive, so what are we afraid of? It's just another harvest season for the little guys.

View OriginalReply0