2025-12-31 01:20:19

#数字资产市场动态 Recently looking at exchange data, I suddenly noticed an interesting phenomenon—

The US version download volume of a leading exchange is actually much lower than that of a compliant platform. Even more surprisingly, it’s not as good as some third-tier exchanges.

What could be the reason behind this? Different user bases? Such a large regional difference? Or is it that the main user group of a leading exchange actually comes from Asia rather than the European and American markets?

This phenomenon seems worth pondering. The user distribution in the crypto market is much more complex than we imagine.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes

Reward
4
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WhaleStalker

· 12h ago

Ha, the data discrepancy is indeed outrageous. Asian traffic is really the main force. --- The low download numbers in the US might also be due to compliance issues; those who are truly active are on the dark web. --- Anyway, the major exchanges are still mainly supported by Asia. The Europe and America region has already been targeted heavily by the SEC. --- So, surface data is deceptive; you need to look at trading volume and activity to get the real picture. --- It's outrageous that a bunch of third-tier exchanges fake their download numbers to look good. It seems the download data itself is inflated. --- I don't know if user distribution is complicated, but it's obvious that Asia is the main source of revenue. --- Major exchanges in Europe and America can't sell anymore; their focus has long shifted east, and the data is just a surface illusion.

View OriginalReply0

LightningHarvester