2025-12-31 01:21:35

If blockchain is compared to a 24/7 operating giant automated factory, then the oracle is the core set of sensors—determining whether the entire system can accurately perceive the external world.

By the end of 2025, layer 2 networks in the Bitcoin ecosystem are already scattered everywhere. But beneath this prosperous appearance, I’ve noticed an interesting phenomenon: finding truly like-minded entrepreneurial partners is no longer as simple as matching resumes. More often, it’s like a resonance under a certain "digital lighthouse"—a resonance at the code level.

At a developer community event last year, I met my current partner, "Lao Mo." At that time, we were both pondering the same question: when Bitcoin’s value perception has been established and liquidity is continuously being released, how can off-chain real-world asset data enter BTC L2 with minimal resistance? That feeling of finding a kindred spirit is like two people tuned to the same frequency finally meeting in a fog-shrouded jungle.

What we are working on now is a brand-new decentralized application, internally called "Omni-Anchor." The base is built on the existing ecosystem framework. The core pain point this product aims to solve is straightforward: the long-standing asset pricing delay in the BTC ecosystem.

From a technical architecture perspective, many current oracle solutions use a combination of multi-node consensus verification and zero-knowledge proofs. This mechanism can synchronize real-world asset price fluctuations off-chain onto the chain at sub-second speeds. It sounds ideal, but in actual deployment, several bottlenecks still arise.

First is data redundancy. If each chain and each application needs to deploy independent verification nodes, the cost becomes too high. Second is time cost. The more consensus rounds during verification, the longer the confirmation takes. Third is flexibility. Many existing solutions have relatively fixed architectures; supporting new asset types or data sources involves high modification costs.

Our approach is to innovate on the basis of modularity. Simply put, it’s about making "data collection"

BTC1,09%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

fren.eth

· 10h ago

Oracles are indeed the bottleneck, well said. Old Mo is reliable, it's really hard to find people who are consistent across channels. Omni-Anchor sounds like something significant; a modular solution is definitely the way out. The pain point of asset pricing delay is really hit home, especially on BTC L2. Wait, data redundancy costs are so high? How can small teams survive? Code resonance—your words really resonate with me. Finally, I’ve met someone who understands.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofster

· 10h ago

honestly the modular oracle approach sounds nice on paper but lemme guess—you're still trusting some validator set, yeah? the real bottleneck isn't architecture, it's always incentive alignment... been there

Reply0

SorryRugPulled

· 10h ago

Old Mo, this guy is pretty good. I understand the feeling of finding the right channel. Data redundancy is really a tough problem; now each solution is more expensive than the last. Omni-Anchor sounds quite interesting, but is the asset pricing delay for BTC L2 really that urgent? There are so many oracle solutions. Can your modular approach really be implemented, or is it just another PPT project? Sub-second synchronization sounds great, but how do you control the costs? That's the key.

View OriginalReply0

ChainWallflower

· 11h ago

Oracles are indeed a bottleneck, and the analogy of the "sensor" is spot on. Old Mo is a reliable guy; it's not easy to find a partner with such consistent coding rhythm. I understand the three issues of data redundancy. If Omni-Anchor can really reduce costs... I'm a bit期待. But to be honest, regarding the modularization方案, it seems that many teams are also试水 now. How do you see the差异化?

View OriginalReply0

MiningDisasterSurvivor

· 11h ago

It's the same old story again, making big promises but the key issues remain unresolved. I've heard modular oracle solutions more than ten times; the same people in 2018 said the same thing. Node costs, consensus delays, asset adaptation... these pitfalls are all false propositions. The real bottleneck is whether the incentive mechanism can stay alive. "Omni-Anchor" sounds fancy, but I'm worried it's just another IP that runs off after raising funds. BTC L2 prosperity? From my perspective, it's all just a front for liquidity mining. When the bear market hits, the true nature is revealed.

View OriginalReply0