Starting to wonder if the algo is just not working as intended, or have the Lighter bulls genuinely lost momentum? This is supposed to be when the project shows real activity and engagement.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OldLeekNewSickle
· 01-03 14:27
I'm tired of hearing that the algorithm isn't working; isn't it just the project team finding another excuse to pass the buck?
View OriginalReply0
MonkeySeeMonkeyDo
· 01-03 04:23
The algorithm is broken, or maybe Lighter itself isn't that good.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterWang
· 2025-12-31 22:57
The algorithm has gone off track; it's time to see the real results.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 2025-12-31 22:57
The algorithm is fine, it's just that the platform is too small. There's nothing much to say.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 2025-12-31 22:54
The algorithm isn't broken; what's broken is the incentive mechanism design itself. Multi-head stall? Don't be silly, that's just a sign that the game equilibrium wasn't calculated correctly in the first place.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 2025-12-31 22:34
Whether it's an algorithm or not, it really feels like the hype is gone. Lighter has indeed cooled down this time.
View OriginalReply0
rugged_again
· 2025-12-31 22:32
Is the algorithm failing or is the bull run really over? Anyway, Lighter is in this state now... It's awkward.
Starting to wonder if the algo is just not working as intended, or have the Lighter bulls genuinely lost momentum? This is supposed to be when the project shows real activity and engagement.