2026-01-04 12:23:38

The emergence of ZAMA perfectly fills the current gap in the Web3 ecosystem. Looking back at previous cycles, we can observe an interesting phenomenon: Bitcoin and Ethereum are not just assets; they have evolved into belief systems. People worship them and spread their teachings. Later on, ecosystem tokens like BNB and Solana took over this role—they, with strong community consensus and loyal fan bases, shaped new market narratives.

Looking at SUI, it also once showed the intention to join this camp. But the market is always ruthless; not all projects can complete this kind of transformation. Can ZAMA break through this dilemma? The key is not in the technology itself, but in whether it can gather enough believers. When a project upgrades from a purely functional tool to a community spiritual symbol, that is the true turning point. How many people now see ZAMA as a belief rather than an investment? The answer to this question may be the key to how far it can go.

BTC-0,16%

ETH-1,16%

BNB0,5%

SOL2%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

InscriptionGriller

· 01-07 10:42

Here comes the hype about faith again, I'm tired of hearing this set of words. What was said about SUI back then, and how it has fallen now, have you all forgotten? To be honest, if ZAMA could really gather believers and holders, it would have done so long ago. Why wait until now? The game of capital schemes is always the same—first create a myth, then harvest the leeks. It's an old trick, brother.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMaskVictim

· 01-05 09:51

Well said, but I feel like ZAMA is a bit overestimated... Compared to faith, it's more about speculation now. --- Faith really requires time to accumulate; ZAMA is still far from that. --- Another "filling the gap" narrative, hearing it too often gets a bit tiresome. --- Have you not learned enough from the SUI lesson? History tends to repeat itself. --- Wait, does anyone really see ZAMA as faith? I think most are just after several times the returns. --- The key still lies in the team and ecosystem development; having only a vision isn't enough. --- This kind of analysis perspective is okay, but very few projects can truly become faith. --- In the end, it all depends on who has stronger promotional ability. --- It seems every new project wants to copy BNB's success, but the difficulty level is exponentially higher. --- Converting belief requires practical application, not just castles in the air.

View OriginalReply0

PoolJumper

· 01-04 12:53

Speaking of which, I'm a bit tired of this "faith theory"... SUI was also hyped up like that back then, but what happened? ZAMA is now just a story of good technology with no users, what's there to believe in? Honestly, compared to faith holders, I care more whether ZAMA's FHE has real commercial applications. Just talking about concepts, how虚虚虚... This community's faith is so cheap now. Everyone wants to copy the BNB story, but the token price is the most honest信仰... Wait, does ZAMA's ecosystem really have projects using it now? Or is it just another PPT ecosystem project? Where there are many people, there is faith; where people disperse, there is none. So the key is to have real stuff, otherwise it's just self-comforting for the chives.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketMonk

· 01-04 12:53

Faith, when you get right down to it, is a collective hallucination in positive feedback... SUI's corpse isn't even cold yet, and you're already hyping ZAMA? Cycles never teach people anything.

View OriginalReply0

SybilSlayer

· 01-04 12:49

Belief sounds very brainwashing, SUI was also hyped like this back then, but now... ZAMA still depends on real user data to speak. Being technically strong doesn't necessarily mean a strong community; we all understand this principle. The real challenge is how to genuinely unite followers. It's just filling a gap and symbolizing faith—same old tricks, brothers. ZAMA is just a tool; don't mythologize it. If it makes money, play with it; don't become a religious follower. This analysis is indeed reasonable, but can faith really be replicated? It doesn't seem that simple. There are countless projects that have risen, but how many have become BNB... ZAMA also depends on luck.

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 01-04 12:45

Faith is too intangible; frankly, it still depends on whether you can make money. It's both technology and community. Listen to how SUI was hyped up initially... and then it was slapped in the face. How many true believers does ZAMA have now? They're all just betting on price increases. No matter how eloquent it sounds, it's better to look at the growth data of wallet addresses.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeVictim

· 01-04 12:33

Faith, to put it simply, is just about having a lot of people. Look at what SUI is like now; technical prowess alone doesn't help. By the way, can ZAMA really gather such a large number of followers? We’ll have to see how subsequent funding rounds and ecosystem development go. They're still talking about "tools becoming faith." We've heard this rhetoric so many times; the key is whether they can hold up. Honestly, the privacy computing track indeed lacks top-tier projects, but ZAMA is still far from reaching the BNB level. I'm just worried it might be another tech-focused team with poor community engagement. No matter how brilliant the code is, it’s all for nothing if the community isn’t strong.

View OriginalReply0

LootboxPhobia

· 01-04 12:29

It sounds reasonable, but honestly, is ZAMA just being treated as a faith-based gamble right now? I'm still a bit skeptical. Can a project have a faith foundation without real development? Solana's ecosystem was also built up before it took off. Talking about community spirit is empty talk; it all depends on actual implementation. Otherwise, it's no different from SUI. Belief, to put it simply, still needs product support; otherwise, it'll eventually fail. I really want to see what the real user data for ZAMA looks like—don't just hype it up as a concept.

View OriginalReply0