Many projects' growth curves are easily recognizable — they are definitely not natural growth. You can sense that there is definitely a plan driving behind the scenes, with a very tight pace.
Recently, I noticed a project with data performance that is indeed outrageous. Just looking at the funding stage alone, it has secured $300 million in support, which already indicates a problem. The key is the supporting growth data, which either skyrockets or stays high, completely inconsistent with the normal growth path of ecological projects.
This situation is common in the crypto market — after large capital injections, various indicators move in unison, creating the illusion of a hot market. Retail investors watch the excitement, thinking the trend is here, but in reality, it might just be capital being carefully orchestrated. To identify such projects, you need to look more at the logic behind the data and not be fooled by superficial prosperity.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DAOdreamer
· 01-06 00:36
300 million USD invested and the data still looks so "natural"? That's hilarious, the tricks are so obvious now.
View OriginalReply0
MoonMathMagic
· 01-05 20:32
Investing 300 million USD, can the data not be outrageous? This tactic is too old.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 01-05 17:43
Investing 300 million dollars, I would consider it a waste if the data doesn't surge dramatically.
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy_Group
· 01-05 16:00
Investing 300 million dollars, the data skyrockets in a straight line. Isn't this just capital dancing? Retail investors really think the bottom-fishing opportunity has arrived, haha.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-addcaaf7
· 01-04 13:48
Spending $300 million, it's strange if the data doesn't surge dramatically—this is just the game that capital plays.
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 01-04 13:47
Investing $300 million, how can the data not soar? This is the magic of capital.
View OriginalReply1
GasFeeDodger
· 01-04 13:39
It's outrageous that the data curve doesn't soar after investing 300 million USD.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodie
· 01-04 13:29
honestly the growth charts look like someone microwaved the tokenomics instead of slow-cooking them... $300m doesn't just translate to organic adoption, it's more like dumping a whole wheel of cheese into a fondue pot and expecting it to taste like a michelin experience. the metrics don't pass basic farm-to-fork verification tests tbh
Many projects' growth curves are easily recognizable — they are definitely not natural growth. You can sense that there is definitely a plan driving behind the scenes, with a very tight pace.
Recently, I noticed a project with data performance that is indeed outrageous. Just looking at the funding stage alone, it has secured $300 million in support, which already indicates a problem. The key is the supporting growth data, which either skyrockets or stays high, completely inconsistent with the normal growth path of ecological projects.
This situation is common in the crypto market — after large capital injections, various indicators move in unison, creating the illusion of a hot market. Retail investors watch the excitement, thinking the trend is here, but in reality, it might just be capital being carefully orchestrated. To identify such projects, you need to look more at the logic behind the data and not be fooled by superficial prosperity.