2026-01-05 01:45:27

Indonesia is taking new steps to strengthen digital asset regulation. According to the latest news, the country's tax authorities will officially launch a data collection program for electronic wallet and cryptocurrency service providers in accordance with Ministry of Finance Regulation No. 108 of 2025.

This move means that electronic wallet operators and crypto service providers will need to provide user transaction data to tax authorities. This is not only an upgrade in Indonesia's digital economy regulation but also reflects the common global demand among major economies for transparency and tax compliance of crypto assets. For trading platforms and wallet service providers operating in Indonesia, data compliance has become an inevitable requirement.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-5854de8b

· 4h ago

Indonesia is starting to tighten regulations again, now exchanges will have to submit data obediently. Speaking of transparency, this is the general trend, mainly depends on who can truly implement it effectively. Data compliance costs are going to rise again, small platforms might have to cry.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSunriser

· 5h ago

Indonesia's current wave requires data, and platforms and wallets must obediently submit it... The era of compliance has arrived, and there's no escaping it.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerGas

· 01-05 02:15

Here we go again, Indonesia has also started to play the data game. Basically, the government wants to see where the money on the chain is flowing and where the taxes are going. What's this logic called in economics... oh right, the elimination of information asymmetry. The current situation for platforms is a classic prisoner's dilemma—either proactively share data to live comfortably or passively expose themselves and risk paying a penalty. The game equilibrium is already there, there's nothing more to say.

View OriginalReply0

NotAFinancialAdvice

· 01-05 02:13

Indonesia's recent move means that exchanges will have to obediently submit data—privacy era is truly over. It's only a matter of time; compliance is the inevitable trend, and there's no escaping it. Another country is starting to regulate, this time Indonesia. Who's next? Wallet service providers are probably going to cry; transparency is good for regulation, but harshly put, it means being under scrutiny. Compliance costs are going up again; small exchanges probably won't be able to withstand it. It's a global chess game, with everyone trying to tax crypto. It's also our users' transparency that makes it possible.

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 01-05 01:52

Another one, Indonesia is now starting to require data as well... Now the CEXs have to honestly hand over user information. Really? Can tax authorities actually get it? It still depends on how it's executed. Compliance, compliance, I'm tired of hearing that. Every country has the same spiel. The Indonesian market is so competitive... Platforms must be incurring additional costs. Wait, is this targeting wallets or exchanges... The rules are a bit unclear on how they are set.

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsTherapist

· 01-05 01:46

Indonesia is starting to crack down again, now those platforms will have to obediently submit data. Another upgrade in regulation, I should have known it would turn out this way. Compliance is unavoidable; we can only keep pushing forward. Now the privacy discussion will heat up again. The Indonesian Tax Department isn't joking. Transparency seems to be truly a global effort now. It will be hard for anyone who just wants to coast along in the future. Wallets should be crying; data will be turned upside down. Another country is tightening regulations; this wave of regulatory wind is blowing fiercely.

View OriginalReply0