There's an interesting divergence brewing at the Federal Reserve over how well regional bank presidents represent their districts. Kashkari has pushed back on the narrative that these leaders don't adequately voice their local economic concerns, taking issue with Bessent's recent characterization. The disagreement highlights deeper questions about Fed governance and whether regional perspectives are truly being captured in monetary policy decisions. This kind of internal debate matters because it shapes how the central bank approaches everything from interest rates to inflation management—factors that ripple through financial markets and crypto sentiment. When you've got competing viewpoints at the top, it usually signals there's more discussion needed before consensus emerges on policy direction.